A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Immunohistochemical assessment of Ki67 with antibodies SP6 and MIB1 in primary breast cancer: a comparison of prognostic value and reproducibility. | LitMetric

Immunohistochemical assessment of Ki67 with antibodies SP6 and MIB1 in primary breast cancer: a comparison of prognostic value and reproducibility.

Histopathology

Department of Oncology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden; Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Published: August 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared two antibodies, SP6 and MIB1, for measuring Ki67, a marker of cell proliferation in primary breast cancer, to assess their prognostic value and reproducibility.
  • A cohort of 237 premenopausal women with node-negative breast cancer was analyzed, and both antibodies showed similar results in classifying samples into proliferation groups.
  • High Ki67 levels indicated poorer distant disease-free survival rates, but neither antibody proved statistically significant in multivariable analysis; MIB1 showed slightly better agreement among assessors than SP6.

Article Abstract

Aims: To compare SP6 and MIB1 antibodies for assessment of Ki67 in primary breast cancer with regard to prognostic value and reproducibility.

Methods And Results: A cohort of 237 premenopausal women with node-negative breast cancer, mainly (87%) not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy, was used. Assessment of Ki67 (SP6 and MIB1) was performed on tissue microarray by three different investigators. The seventh decile was applied for cut-off. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was chosen as endpoint and the follow-up was restricted to 5 years. Eighty-nine per cent of the samples were classified into the same proliferation group, irrespective of antibody used. For both antibodies, high Ki67 was associated with inferior DDFS in univariable analyses (SP6: HR 2.5, P = 0.01; and MIB1: HR 2.8, P = 0.004), but failed to reach statistical significance for DDFS in multivariable analyses adjusted for HER2, age, and tumour size (SP6: HR 2.0, P = 0.074; and MIB1: HR 2.2, P = 0.058). The agreement between different assessors was somewhat higher for MIB1 than for SP6 (κ 0.83-0.88 versus 0.72-0.77).

Conclusions: SP6 was not superior to MIB1, but the two antibodies were comparable in the assessment of Ki67. Both MIB1 and SP6 could therefore be considered for prognostic use in primary breast cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.12392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

assessment ki67
16
breast cancer
16
sp6 mib1
12
primary breast
12
sp6
8
mib1
8
mib1 antibodies
8
mib1 sp6
8
ki67
5
immunohistochemical assessment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!