A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A prospective study of clinical outcomes related to third molar removal or retention. | LitMetric

A prospective study of clinical outcomes related to third molar removal or retention.

Am J Public Health

Greg J. Huang is with the Department of Orthodontics, Joana Cunha-Cruz and Charles Spiekerman are with the Department of Oral Health Sciences, Marilynn Rothen is with Regional Clinical Dental Research Center, and Mark Drangsholt is with the Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle. Loren Anderson is in private practice, Kennewick, WA. Gayle A. Roset is in private practice, Billings, MT.

Published: April 2014

Objectives: We investigated outcomes of third molar removal or retention in adolescents and young adults.

Methods: We recruited patients aged 16 to 22 years from a dental practice-based research network in the Pacific Northwest from May 2009 through September 2010 who had at least 1 third molar present and had never undergone third molar removal. Data were acquired via questionnaire and clinical examination at baseline, periodic online questionnaires, and clinical examination at 24 months.

Results: A total of 801 patients participated. Among patients undergoing third molar removal, rates of paresthesia and jaw joint symptoms lasting more than 1 month were 6.3 and 34.3 per 100 person-years, respectively. Among patients not undergoing removal, corresponding rates were 0.7 and 8.8. Periodontal attachment loss at distal sites of second molars did not significantly differ by third molar removal status. Incident caries at the distal surfaces of second molars occurred in fewer than 1% of all sites.

Conclusions: Rates of paresthesia and temporomandibular joint disorder were higher after third molar removal. Periodontal attachment loss and incident caries at the distal sites of second molars were not affected by extraction status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025699PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301649DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

third molar
28
molar removal
24
second molars
12
outcomes third
8
removal retention
8
clinical examination
8
patients undergoing
8
rates paresthesia
8
periodontal attachment
8
attachment loss
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!