The arterial input function (AIF) plays a crucial role in the quantification of cerebral perfusion parameters. The traditional method for AIF detection is based on manual operation, which is time-consuming and subjective. Two automatic methods have been reported that are based on two frequently used clustering algorithms: fuzzy c-means (FCM) and K-means. However, it is still not clear which is better for AIF detection. Hence, we compared the performance of these two clustering methods using both simulated and clinical data. The results demonstrate that K-means analysis can yield more accurate and robust AIF results, although it takes longer to execute than the FCM method. We consider that this longer execution time is trivial relative to the total time required for image manipulation in a PACS setting, and is acceptable if an ideal AIF is obtained. Therefore, the K-means method is preferable to FCM in AIF detection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913570PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0085884PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aif detection
12
fuzzy c-means
8
arterial input
8
input function
8
aif
6
comparison k-means
4
k-means fuzzy
4
c-means algorithm
4
algorithm performance
4
performance automated
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!