[Meta-analysis: principles and pitfalls].

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, Utrecht.

Published: November 2014

In a meta-analysis results of different studies are summarized quantitatively. This gives a much more precise effect estimate than is possible in individual studies. Prior to the analysis, all relevant studies should be traced, including studies with less favourable results. Exclusion of 'negative' studies may lead to overestimation of the effect. Because the results of a meta-analysis depend on the quality of the included studies, the quality and risk of bias of all studies should be systematically assessed. Quantitative summary of results is only practicable if the studies are homogeneous, i.e. sufficiently similar with respect to the study populations, interventions or exposure, outcomes and point of measurement. In cases of clinical heterogeneity, meta-analysis could be conducted in clinically homogeneous subgroups. Statistical heterogeneity can be discounted by using a random-effects model. Meta-analyses can be applied to research questions regarding aetiology, diagnosis, treatment or prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

studies
8
[meta-analysis principles
4
principles pitfalls]
4
pitfalls] meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis studies
4
studies summarized
4
summarized quantitatively
4
quantitatively precise
4
precise estimate
4
estimate individual
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!