Limited therapeutic benefits of intra-articular cortisone injection for patients with femoro-acetabular impingement and labral tear.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA,

Published: April 2014

Purpose: Intra-articular (IA) hip cortisone injection is commonly performed as a therapeutic modality in patients with femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). To our knowledge, there is no published data evaluating the clinical benefit of these injections. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of therapeutic IA cortisone injection in these patients.

Methods: At our institution, patients with FAI and labral tear prospectively recorded their numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores pre-injection, during post-injection anaesthetic phase, and at 14 days post-injection. From this cohort, all patients treated with guided IA cortisone injection, no radiographic evidence of arthritis (Tönnis grade 0 or 1) and pain relief during the anaesthetic phase of the IA injection were included. An absolute change of two points on the NRS score was considered the minimal amount of clinically significant pain relief. Pain scores were compared between the different types of steroid injected.

Results: Fifty-four patients (35 females, 19 males) with a mean age of 32 ± 12 years were included. Average median pre-injection NRS score was 7.0 (range 2.5-10.0), post-injection anaesthetic phase was 1.0 (range 0.0-5.0), and 14 day post-injection was 5.0 (range 0.0-10.0). As a group, NRS scores significantly diminished from post-injection anaesthetic phase to 14 days post-injection (p < 0.001). At 14 days post-injection, only 20 patients (37 %) and at 6 weeks, only 3 patients (6 %) reported a clinically significant decrease in pain. Average duration of pain relief was 9.8 days. There was no difference in pain reduction between steroid preparations.

Conclusion: In patients with symptomatic FAI and labral tear, intra-articular cortisone injection has limited clinical benefit as a therapeutic modality. However, anaesthetic-only IA injections for patients who may be candidates for hip arthroscopy can be a useful diagnostic tool.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2862-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cortisone injection
20
anaesthetic phase
16
labral tear
12
post-injection anaesthetic
12
days post-injection
12
pain relief
12
patients
9
intra-articular cortisone
8
therapeutic modality
8
clinical benefit
8

Similar Publications

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the foot and ankle is prevalent and often debilitating, necessitating effective treatment options. This study evaluates the analgesic efficacy of corticosteroid injections in individual foot and ankle joints. Stepping Hill Hospital conducted a retrospective audit of 166 patients who received guided corticosteroid injections.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Dermatologic office procedures involving needles including injection of local anesthetic both cutaneously and intraorally, botulinum toxin, fillers and keloids, as well as venipuncture and a plethora of other procedures can often cause pain that ranges from mild to severe. The technique of utilizing vibration frequently lessens pain. Vibration anesthesia is a non-invasive, inexpensive, virtually side-effect free, and well-established method of lessening pain during dermatologic procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Tennis elbow, also known as lateral epicondylitis, is a common injury among adults and is typically treated with rest, physical therapy, bracing, and anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • - For severe cases with full thickness tears, surgery has been the main treatment, but a new case report discusses a 56-year-old man treated successfully with microfragmented adipose transfer after a corticosteroid injection caused a rupture.
  • - Follow-up evaluations showed significant improvement, suggesting this treatment could be a viable alternative to surgery for full thickness tears, although more research is needed to confirm its effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Bovine bioinductive collagen implants (herein, "bovine collagen implant") can be used to augment rotator cuff repair. Concern exists that these bovine collagen implants may not yield clinical benefits and may actually increase postoperative stiffness and the need for reoperation.

Questions/purposes: Among patients who underwent primary rotator cuff repair with or without a bovine collagen implant, we asked: (1) Did the proportion of patients undergoing reoperation for postoperative stiffness and inflammation differ between the bovine collagen implant and control groups? (2) Did short-term patient-reported outcomes differ between the two groups? (3) Did the proportion of patients receiving postoperative methylprednisolone prescriptions and corticosteroid injections differ between the two groups?

Methods: We performed a retrospective, matched, comparative study of patients 18 years and older with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent primary arthroscopic repair of partial or full-thickness rotator cuff tears diagnosed by MRI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!