Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 144
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (MVR) with the MitraClip(®) system in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) is known to reduce symptoms and to improve cardiac morphology and function. MitraClip has been approved for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To date, however, no systematic analysis exists on cardiac MRI in patients undergoing the MitraClip procedure.
Objective: The aim of this study was to (1) prove feasibility and robustness of cardiac MRI and (2) visualize effects of the procedure on cardiac morphology and function by cardiac MRI.
Methods: 27 consecutive patients (age 77.5 ± 7.6 years) with symptomatic moderate to severe MR undergoing the MitraClip(®) procedure were prospectively included. Cardiac MRI at 1.5 T was performed before and at 3 months after intervention. Cardiac morphology and function were evaluated using steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine sequences by assessment of left ventricular enddiastolic and endsystolic diameters (LVEDD, LVESD) and volumes (EDV, ESV), ejection fraction (LVEF) and stroke volume (SV), diameter of mitral annulus, and myocardial mass (MM). Planimetry of the left atrium (LA) was performed in identical slices in a four-chamber view.
Results: Around the clip an extinction artifact was observed which did not disturb the evaluation of cardiac morphology and function. At follow-up, we observed significant decreases of LVEDD (58.0 to 53.3 mm, p < 0.0001), EDV (167 to 159 mL, p = 0.0006) and ESV (101 to 89 mL, p < 0.0001), diameter of mitral annulus (41.4 to 37.9 mm, p < 0.0001), myocardial mass (148.4 to 144.5 g, p = 0.0004) and LA size (40.2 to 37.6 cm(2), p < 0.0001). LVEF improved (43.3 to 46.7 %, p = 0.0041).
Conclusions: Cardiac MRI is feasible and robust in patients with MitraClips. The clinical benefit of a successful MitraClip intervention is paralleled by significant improvements of cardiac morphology and function which can be monitored and validated using MRI in clinical follow-up examinations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-014-0670-x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!