Can rotatory knee laxity be predicted in isolated anterior cruciate ligament surgery?

Int Orthop

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy,

Published: June 2014

Purpose: Despite the overall success of the surgical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, some patients still present with instability symptoms even after the surgery, mainly due to the presence of associated lesions. At present, the pivot shift test has been reported to be the benchmark to assess rotatory knee laxity. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate rotatory knee laxity at time-zero in order to determine whether detected post-reconstruction laxity was predictable by its value measured before the reconstruction, which was hypothized to be influenced by the presence of associated lesions.

Methods: Rotatory knee laxity was retrospectively analysed in 42 patients, including two different ACL reconstructions. The maximal anterior displacement and the absolute value of the posterior acceleration reached during the reduction of the tibial lateral compartment were intra-operatively acquired by using a navigation system and identified as discriminating parameters. For each parameter, statistical linear regression analysis (line slope and intercept) was performed between pre- and post-reconstruction values.

Results: No statistically significant influence of the initial posterior acceleration on the post-reconstruction outcome was found (line slope, p > 0.05), although a statistically significant line intercept was indeed identified (p < 0.001). A statistically significant influence on the surgery outcome was instead found for the initial value of the anterior tibial displacement (line slope = 0.39, p = 0.004), meaning that, on average, about 40 % of the post-reconstruction lateral compartment displacement could be explained by the corresponding pre-reconstruction value. Both of these findings highlighted the importance of intra-operative quantification of rotatory knee laxity to identify correct indications for the surgery.

Conclusions: This study provided important implications for the future possibility of defining a quantifying tool able to assess rotatory knee laxity during ACL reconstruction. This could allow detection of additional injuries to secondary restraints by easily performing rotatory knee laxity tests, which in turn could reduce post-surgical recurrence of knee instability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037502PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2287-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotatory knee
16
knee laxity
16
anterior cruciate
8
cruciate ligament
8
presence associated
8
posterior acceleration
8
laxity
5
rotatory
4
laxity predicted
4
predicted isolated
4

Similar Publications

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) is considered a secondary stabilizer of internal rotation and, due to proximity to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), it may contribute to anterolateral rotatory stability. This study characterized the anatomy of the ALL and associated tissues of the anterolateral complex (ALC) to determine if structural and histological compensatory adaptations exist in patients without an ALL. Forty-nine cadaveric knees were dissected from distal-to-proximal using established landmarks with the aid of internal rotation stress to localize the ALL (if present), LCL, iliotibial band (ITB), and anterolateral capsule.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Meniscal forces and knee kinematics are affected by tibial slope modifying high tibial osteotomy.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

January 2025

Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory, Departments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Purpose: To quantify the effect of increasing the posterior tibial slope (PTS) on knee kinematics and the resultant medial and lateral meniscal forces.

Methods: In this controlled laboratory study, a 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) robotic testing system was used to apply external loading conditions to seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees: (1) 200-N axial compressive load, (2) 5-N m internal tibial +10-N m valgus torque and (3) 5-N m external tibial + 10-N m varus torque. Knee kinematics and the resultant medial and lateral meniscal forces were acquired for two PTS states: (1) native PTS and (2) increased PTS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To synthesize the current literature on posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction and repair, focusing on a comparison of surgical techniques and outcomes based on injury chronicity in the setting of sports-related ligament tears.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature, including queries of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, was performed in March 2024. Studies were included if they were of Level IV evidence or greater, reported PLC reconstruction or repair outcomes, and had a minimum 2-year follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Functional knee bracing provides protection to the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads.

Clin Biomech (Bristol)

December 2024

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address:

Background: The aim of the study was to quantify the effect of functional knee bracing on native knee kinematics and the in-situ force in the ACL in response to external loading.

Methods: A robotic testing system was used to apply three external loads from full extension to 60° of flexion to eight fresh frozen human cadaveric knees: 1) a 134 N anterior load, 2) a combined 5-Nm internal rotation +5-Nm valgus torque, and 3) a combined 5-Nm external rotation +5-Nm valgus torque. For native and braced states, kinematics were recorded and the in-situ force in the ACL was determined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients submitted to re-revision ACL reconstruction present more knee laxity, more complications, and a higher failure rate than patients submitted to the first revision ACL reconstruction.

Knee

January 2025

Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 333 - Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP CEP: 05403-010, Brazil.

Background: Few comparative studies have evaluated patients who underwent two revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and patients who underwent one revision ACLR, and many of them have a short postoperative follow-up and a relatively small number of patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the functional results, complications, and failure rates of patients who underwent one revision ACLR and patients who underwent two revision ACLRs.

Methods: This is a retrospective study comparing patients who underwent one revision ACLR (Group 1) with patients who underwent a re-revision ACLR (Group 2).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!