Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.

Contraception

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.

Published: June 2014

Objective: This trial was designed to compare levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) use at 1 year after delivery between women randomized to postplacental insertion at the time of cesarean delivery and delayed insertion 4-8 weeks after delivery.

Study Design: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at two urban medical centers. Eligible pregnant women with planned cesarean deliveries were randomized to immediate postplacental insertion during cesarean or delayed insertion after 4-8 weeks. We used intention-to-treat analysis for the primary outcome of LNG-IUD use 12 months after delivery.

Results: Forty-two women were randomized, 20 into the postplacental group and 22 in the delayed group. Although confirmed use of the LNG-IUD 12 months after delivery was higher in the postplacental group (60.0% vs. 40.9%, p=.35), this difference was not statistically significance. Expulsion was significantly more common in the postplacental group (20.0% vs. 0%, p=.04). There were significant differences between the two sites in baseline population characteristics, follow-up and expulsion. The trial did not answer the intended question as it was halted early due to slow enrollment.

Conclusions: Our results show higher expulsion after postplacental insertion compared to delayed insertion but suggest similar IUD use at 12 months. Moreover, it provides valuable lessons regarding a randomized controlled trial of postplacental LNG-IUD placement due to the challenges of estimating effect size and the nature of the population who might benefit from immediate insertion.

Implications: Postplacental insertion of an IUD may improve use of highly effective contraception during the postpartum period. While our results suggest higher expulsion after postplacental insertion compared to delayed insertion and similar IUD use at 12 months, our trial was insufficient to definitively test our hypothesis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.12.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postplacental insertion
24
delayed insertion
20
randomized controlled
12
controlled trial
12
randomized postplacental
12
postplacental group
12
insertion iud
12
postplacental
10
insertion
10
levonorgestrel intrauterine
8

Similar Publications

Women's experiences with the post-placental intrauterine device: a qualitative study.

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet

October 2024

Universidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to investigate how women experience and make decisions regarding postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) insertion during the postpartum period.
  • - Using face-to-face semi-structured interviews, researchers talked to 25 women about their experiences, focusing on the decision-making process, their relationships with healthcare providers, and their knowledge about contraception.
  • - Findings highlighted the importance of effective communication from health professionals, awareness of PPIUD benefits, and the timing of when PPIUD is discussed, suggesting that the decision-making process continues even after the insertion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the method of immediate postpartum IUD (ppIUD) insertion (manual versus ring forceps) and expulsion rate within 6-week postpartum.

Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a singleton vaginal delivery and an immediate ppIUD inserted at Rush University from January 2014 to September 2023. The primary outcome was rate of expulsion within 6-week postpartum.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess the expulsion rates of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) within the first three years of its insertion program following delivery.
  • Data from 235 LNG-IUD insertions showed varying expulsion rates across the three years; rates decreased significantly from year 1 (28%) to year 3 (15%).
  • A comparison revealed that manual insertion led to a higher expulsion rate compared to ring-forceps insertion (36% vs. 16%), indicating that the method of insertion can impact effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background and objective Unplanned pregnancies are very common in the postpartum period, and they often lead to negative outcomes such as abortion, low-birth-weight neonates, early delivery, postpartum bleeding, and fetal mortality. In the first 12 months after delivery, closely spaced and unintentional pregnancies can be prevented with postpartum contraception. The postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is a method of family planning that may be used during the first few weeks after giving birth, and it is highly successful, reliable, affordable, non-hormonal, immediately reversible, long-acting, and does not interfere with lactation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is safe method of contraception, but with low acceptability rate. Factors that govern acceptability needs to be addressed for increasing its rate. This study was done to assess the acceptance, efficiency, and complications of PPIUCD in tertiary centre of Jharkhand, India.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!