Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional stresses around implants and supporting tissues placed in different combinations in the grafted and nongrafted atrophic posterior maxilla and to consider the acceptability of various fixed partial denture treatment options.
Materials And Methods: A computer model of the atrophic posterior maxilla was created from the computed tomography images of an actual patient. Three different treatment scenarios were modeled with partial denture restorations, grafted and nongrafted maxillary sinuses, and various implant inclinations. Oblique forces were applied to simulate chewing movements. Stress analyses were performed with a three-dimensional finite element analysis computer program, and the von Mises and minimum principal stresses on the implants and supporting tissues were compared.
Results: In all models, minimum principal (compressive) stress peak points were the highest within the crestal cortical bone (49.761 MPa), lower within sinus cortical (14.144 MPa) and trabecular bone (4.347 MPa), and lowest within grafted bone (0.049 MPa). The second molar implant in the third model (5×11-mm implant, inclined 45 degrees) showed the highest von Mises stresses (499.50 MPa), and the second molar implant in the first model (6×5-mm implant) showed the lowest (219.63 MPa) von Mises stresses.
Conclusion: The stress absorption capacity of graft material is not sufficient and is much lower than that of other supporting tissues. For a fixed partial prosthesis, the use of short, wide implants with sinus floor bicortical fixation was found to be the most feasible approach for the atrophied posterior maxilla.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3264 | DOI Listing |
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tishreen University. Electronic address:
Introduction And Importance: Restoring lost teeth in the posterior atrophic maxilla presents a significant challenge due to insufficient bone volume for implant placement. Simultaneous implant placement during lateral sinus lift is often considered, but the decision is typically based on the amount of existing bone. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of simultaneous implant placement and maxillary sinus floor augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla using autogenous bone ring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent
January 2025
Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University; Clinical Research Center of Shaanxi Province for Dental and Maxillofacial Disease, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University; Department of Implant Dentistry, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University. Electronic address:
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of the semi-active robotic system for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla.
Methods: Patients underwent robot-assisted implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla were identified and included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before surgery.
Surg Radiol Anat
January 2025
Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Purpose: The greater palatine foramen (GPF) represents the inferior opening of the greater palatine canal and is located posterolaterally on both sides of the hard palate. The aim of this study is to morphometrically characterise the GPF and to determine its anatomical relationships in a Portuguese population.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed based on the clinical records which included all permanent teeth erupted and a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the entire maxilla.
BMJ Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pondicherry, India.
A calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour (CEOT) is a rare benign odontogenic tumour of epithelial origin accounting for approximately 1% of all odontogenic tumours. The intraosseous form occurs more commonly in the posterior mandible whereas the extraosseous form is common in the anterior maxilla. CEOT is often asymptomatic and presents with a painless swelling of the mandible.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Clin Pediatr Dent
December 2024
Department of Orthodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Introduction: This study describes a novel device known as "SAVE" to effectively protract the deficient maxilla in class III malocclusion by quantifying and evaluating the changes in the maxilla through a finite element analysis (FEA).
Materials And Methods: The patented novel SAVE device was three-dimensionally modeled using Autodesk Fusion 360. An existing computed tomography (CT) scan of a patient exhibiting class III malocclusion was used to generate a finite element (FE) model.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!