Symptomatic rectocele: what are the indications for repair?

Am J Surg

Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve Medical School, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Published: March 2014

Background: The surgical indications for symptomatic rectocele are undefined, and surgery has high recurrence rates. We implemented magnetic resonance imaging defecography (MRID) to determine if utilizing strict inclusion criteria for rectocele repair improves outcomes.

Methods: Patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) who underwent dynamic MRID were evaluated. Indications for surgical repair were defecation requiring manual assistance and the following MRID results: anterior defect >2 cm, incomplete evacuation, and the absence of perineal descent. Primary outcomes were the change in quality of life (QOL) scores and recurrence.

Results: From 2006 to 2013, 143 patients who presented with ODS underwent MRID. Seventeen patients met the criteria for repair. Recurrence was low (5.8%) with a median follow-up of 23 months, QOL scores improved from 57.3 to 76.5 (P = .041).

Conclusions: A minority of patients (12%) with ODS met the above criteria for rectocele repair. Patients who underwent repair had a significant improvement in QOL and low recurrence rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

symptomatic rectocele
8
criteria rectocele
8
rectocele repair
8
ods underwent
8
qol scores
8
met criteria
8
repair
5
patients
5
rectocele indications
4
indications repair?
4

Similar Publications

Use of vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: Risk factors for failure one year after insertion.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

December 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France; Inserm U1086 "ANTICIPE", Unité de Recherche Interdisciplinaire pour la Prévention et le Traitement des Cancers, Caen, France.

Introduction: Vaginal pessaries are offered as a first-line treatment for symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The objective of our study was to identify risk factors for failure of pessary use within 1 year of insertion.

Materials And Methods: We prospectively included women who accepted a pessary fitting for symptomatic POP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Functional defecation disorders (FDD) are a common etiology of refractory chronic constipation (CC). FDD diagnosis (dyssynergic defecation [DD] and inadequate defecatory propulsion [IDP]), requires diagnostic tests including anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). Biofeedback (BF) is the treatment of choice for DD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is regarded as the gold standard treatment for apical or multicompartment prolapse, predominantly with anterior compartment descent. However, the optimal surgical approach for concurrent rectocele is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in managing multicompartment prolapse with concurrent rectocele (≥stage II), analyzing the anatomical outcomes, the necessity for concomitant or subsequent posterior repair, and the impact on bowel function in women undergoing surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the outcomes of a new surgical technique called pelvic organ prolapse suspension (POPS) for treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and rectal prolapse, focusing on patients who experience recurrence of symptoms after the procedure.
  • The research involved 25 women, primarily menopausal, who mostly had recurrent posterior vaginal wall prolapse and associated obstructed defecation syndrome, with all undergoing laparoscopic ventral rectopexy surgery.
  • Findings indicated no anatomical recurrences after surgery and a significant improvement in patient symptoms, suggesting that a multidisciplinary approach and the use of minimally invasive techniques can be effective for managing recurrent POP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) affects both men and women, and dynamic magnetic resonance defecography (DMRD) is a more effective diagnostic tool compared to clinical exams; however, studies focused on Indian patients are limited, especially for males.* -
  • In a study of 57 adult patients with pelvic floor symptoms, DMRD revealed significantly more cases of conditions like cystocele and rectal prolapse compared to clinical evaluations, establishing a strong correlation for diagnosing these issues.* -
  • The findings suggest that DMRD enhances the diagnostic process for pelvic floor dysfunction by providing additional information that could improve patient management, and it should be considered alongside clinical examinations for symptomatic individuals.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!