Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To compare the long-term results of transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty in patients after implantation of drug-eluting coronary artery stents with permanent or biosoluble polymer coatings.
Material And Methods: This was a prospective, comparative, single-center trial. It enrolled patients having at least 70% stenosis who had undergone intracoronary Cypher (SES) or EucaTAX (EUPES) stent implantation.
Results: The trial included 602 subjects, including 282 patients with a placed EUPES stent and 320 patients with an implanted SES stent. Two years later, there was a higher rate of repeat revascularization in the EUPES group than in the SES group (16.3% versus 6.25%; p = 0.0001) and that of great unfavorable events in these groups (18.4% versus 7.8%; p = 0.001). According to the angiographic parameters of in-stent restenosis, the rate of repeat target-segment revascularization was significantly higher in the EUPES group than that in the EucaTAX group while stenting coronary arteries less than 3 mm in diameter, using stents more than 18 mm in length, as well as in residual stenosis of more than 12% as compared to the SES group.
Conclusion: In the SES group, the clinical outcomes were better than those in the EUPES group during 2-year follow-up; the rate of target lesion revascularization was significantly higher in the EUPES group.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!