Balloon Sinuplasty is a new technique which has revolutionized sinus surgery in recent times. Since its introduction in USA in 2004, it has become popular world-wide, due to its sophisticated technology, which uses balloon dilatational systems for dilating the sinus ostia through a minimally invasive approach and has provided satisfactory results in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Recent world literature supports the efficacy and outcomes of Balloon Sinuplasty system, with large multi-centric studies proving it to be a very effective tool in the management of various sinus pathologies. We performed this prospective clinical study to assess the efficacy & outcomes of Balloon Sinuplasty among 20 patients at our institution, who were followed up for 12 months after surgery. Patients were included as per inclusion criteria formulated for this study & were analyzed with respect to their pre-operative & post-operative symptomatology scores in comparison with their objective Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy (DNE) & Computerized Tomography Scan of Paranasal Sinuses (CT-PNS) scoring systems. Significant improvements were recorded in patient's symptoms, from the first post-operative week until the end of the study period, and were objectively confirmed by the DNE & CT-PNS scores. The observations & results of our study highlight the efficacy of Balloon Sinuplasty technology in comparison to similar studies reported in recent world literature.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738804 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0462-9 | DOI Listing |
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
December 2024
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 272, FI-33101, Tampere, Finland.
Purpose: To evaluate and compare hospital related costs, postoperative costs, and the long-term costs of maxillary balloon sinuplasty (BSP) and middle meatal antrostomy (MMA) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Methods: Data were collected from patient registers on 88 patients treated with BSP and 240 patients treated with MMA between 2011 and 2017. Information was also gathered on the related costs of surgery, material, postoperative ward care, and any extra patient visits that took place within one year following the operation.
Spartan Med Res J
September 2024
College of Osteopathic Medicine- Statewide Campus System, East Lansing, MI 48824 Michigan State University.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
December 2024
Texas Children's Hospital - Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci
July 2024
Department of OMFS, Shri. Yashwantrao Chavan Memorial Medical and Rural Development Foundation's Dental College and Hospital, MIDC, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
Objective: Current research compared traditional FESS, balloon sinuplasty, and powered instruments for CRS efficiency.
Methods: A prospective comparison analysis of 150 CRS patients who received FESS. The surgical method divided the patients into three groups: Group A (conventional FESS, = 50), Group B (balloon sinuplasty, = 50), and Group C (powered instrumentation, = 50).
Spartan Med Res J
September 2024
Graduate Medical Education, Otolaryngology McLaren Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, MI, USA.
Introduction: Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) is a common treatment modality used in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although it has gained popularity, minimal self-reported data on its utilization and complications have been reported. The goal of this study was to describe current practices and complications experienced during frontal sinus BSP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!