Balloon dilators for labor induction: a historical review.

J Med Ethics Hist Med

Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.

Published: January 2014

A number of recent articles attribute the origin of the use of cervical balloon dilation in the induction of labor to either Barnes in the 1860s or Embrey and Mollison in the 1960s. This review examines the historical record and reveals that, based on current practice attribution should rather be made to two contemporaries of Barnes: the Storer and Mattei. More importantly, Storer's warning about the rubber used in dilators was ignored, leading to decades of possibly unnecessary deaths following childbirth. To conduct this study key search terms for PubMed, Google Scholar and the website of the University of Ryerson were utilized as "Barnes", "Woodman", "balloon dilation", "balloon catheter", "foley", "colpeurynter", "cervix uteri" and "induction." Subsequent analysis was done on downloaded articles using BibDesk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3885146PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

balloon dilators
4
dilators labor
4
labor induction
4
induction historical
4
historical review
4
review number
4
number articles
4
articles attribute
4
attribute origin
4
origin cervical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!