Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The present case report describes the case of a 15-year-old female who was referred with a radiolucent lesion between her mandibular right molars. The original radiographic image suggested the presence of an odontogenic cyst. The surgical enucleation and the following osteotomy of the residual cavity was performed by using the piezoelectric technology. The histological analysis confirmed that the lesion was an odontogenic keratocyst with no evidence of epithelial invasion in the connective tissue wall. The patient refused any further surgical treatment. In consideration of the pathological result - no presence of invasive epithelial cells in the connective tissue wall of the cyst- the patient was suggested a "follow-up and wait-and-see policy", with more extensive surgical treatment to be given only in case of a recurrence. The patient was followed up clinically and radiographically at 6 months intervals for 5 years.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!