Multi-session statistics on beamformed MEG data.

Neuroimage

Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address:

Published: July 2014

Beamforming has been widely adopted as a source reconstruction technique in the analysis of magnetoencephalography data. Most beamforming implementations incorporate a spatially-varying rescaling (which we term weights normalisation) to correct for the inherent depth bias in raw beamformer estimates. Here, we demonstrate that such rescaling can cause critical problems whenever analyses are performed over multiple sessions of separately beamformed data, for example when comparing effect sizes between different populations. Importantly, we show that the weights-normalised beamformer estimates of neural activity can even lead to a reversal in the inferred sign of the effect being measured. We instead recommend that no weights normalisation be carried out; any depth bias is instead accounted for in the calculation of multi-session (e.g. group) statistics. We demonstrate the severity of the weights normalisation confound with a 2-D simulation, and in real MEG data by performing a group statistical analysis to detect differences in alpha power in eyes-closed rest compared with continuous visual stimulation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073650PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weights normalisation
12
meg data
8
data beamforming
8
depth bias
8
beamformer estimates
8
multi-session statistics
4
statistics beamformed
4
beamformed meg
4
data
4
beamforming adopted
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!