Background: The aim of this study was to describe the effect of pretreatment prostate volume on urinary quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Methods: A total of 368 men treated with prostate IMRT (77.4-81 Gy) were stratified into three gland volume groups, ie, <30 g (group 1), 30-60 g (group 2), and >60 g (group 3). Post-IMRT urinary function was evaluated by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 genitourinary guidelines at one year post-IMRT, and surveyed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) before treatment, and then at one month and one year post-IMRT.
Results: Late (one year post-IMRT) CTCAE version 4.0 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 11/368 (3.0%) men, but was not severe (grade ≥ 3); total toxicity was similar between the prostate volume groups (P = 0.86). Continuous prostate volume neither correlated with (P = 0.50) nor predicted late genitourinary toxicity (univariate odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.96-1.02). The total IPSS cohort, group 1 (<30 g) and 2 (30-60 g), showed a similar IPSS trend of elevation from pretreatment baseline to one month post-IMRT (each P < 0.01), then a reduction to baseline at one year (each P < 0.01). Group 3 (>60 g) had the highest pretreatment IPSS, but uniquely showed a better urinary symptom trend than the smaller volume groups, with similar IPSS from baseline to one month post-IMRT (P = 0.88) and improved post-treatment IPSS from baseline at one year (P = 0.003).
Conclusion: Pretreatment prostate volume and initial IPSS scores were not associated with increased late genitourinary toxicity after IMRT in our series. Patients with smaller prostates had an initial increase in urinary symptoms, but returned to baseline at one year. Larger prostate glands (>60 g) had comparatively worse pretreatment symptoms, but at one year showed an overall improvement in IPSS versus baseline.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827019 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S38093 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
December 2024
Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, USA.
Lung cancer is the third most prevalent cancer, following breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men. However, it remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. As treatment options have advanced, the significance of accurate diagnosis has increased, enabling targeted and more personalized therapeutic treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Oncol
January 2025
Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Introduction: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and urinary toxicity of LDR-brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Materials And Methods: 235 primary prostate cancer patients treated with LDR-brachytherapy and subsequently followed up in our center were included in this study. Biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated.
Indian J Urol
January 2025
Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Introduction: Focal therapy (FT) is emerging as an alternative to radical treatment for prostate cancer (CaP). The purpose of this study is to assess the current perceptions of FT amongst urologists.
Methods: A 22-item questionnaire was e-mailed to members of the American Urological Association.
Indian J Urol
January 2025
Uro-Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Introduction: Recently, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System - 3 lesions (PI-RADS 3) have been sub classified into "3a" - lesions with a volume of <0.5 mL and "3b" - lesions exceeding 0.5 mL, whereas the prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) is an established adjunct tool for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Biomed Opt
January 2025
Lund University, Department of Physics, Lund, Sweden.
Significance: The spatial distribution of the photosensitizing drug concentration is an important parameter for predicting the photodynamic therapy (PDT) outcome. Current diffuse fluorescence tomography methods lack accuracy in quantifying drug concentration. The development of accurate methods for monitoring the temporal evolution of the drug distribution in tissue can advance the real-time light dosimetry in PDT of tumors, leading to better treatment outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!