Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection constitutes the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and high-risk nonmuscle-invasive disease refractory to instillation therapy. Although RC is performed with curative intent, the overall 5-year survival has been reported to be as low as 62% in the current literature. Various clinicopathological parameters determine post-RC outcome, but besides these, the role of comorbidity has gained increasing attention. In the current clinical practice, comorbidity information is quantified using various evaluated comorbidity indices. In this paper, we discuss the most recent data on comorbidity and performance indices assessed in patients undergoing RC and highlight their clinical implications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737140.2014.868775 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!