A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Serum level of soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha as a predictor of treatment response in brucellosis. | LitMetric

Introduction: Iran is one of the endemic regions with high prevalence of brucellosis. Several serological markers for diagnosis and response to treatment are available. Serum level of Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha (SIL-2Ralpha) is a new marker to assess response to therapy and clinical relapse of brucellosis. This study intends to investigate the serum levels of SIL-2Ralpha before and after treatment, to evaluate this marker for patients responding to treatment of brucellosis.

Methods: This study is an analytical cross-sectional study. Forty patients who had clinical signs of brucellosis and serological tests confirmed the disease have been treated with standard antibiotics for 6 weeks. 2ME and SIL-2Ralpha levels were measured before and after treatment and these values were compared.

Results: Among the 40 patients, 27 patients (67.5%) had improvement in symptoms and 13 patients (32.5%) had no symptoms after treatment. In Comparing serum levels of SIL-2Ralpha and 2ME before and after treatment, decreasing of both markers after treatment was significant (p < 0.001). In patients with false positive for 2ME, SIL-2Ralpha in 57% of patients had a reduction, but in patients with false negative for 2ME, SIL-2Ralpha in only 28% of patients increased.

Conclusion: Not only is Serum level of SIL-2Ralpha useful for predicting response to treatment of brucellosis, but also in cases of false positive of 2ME can be helpful.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

serum level
12
2me sil-2ralpha
12
treatment
9
patients
9
level soluble
8
soluble interleukin-2
8
interleukin-2 receptor
8
receptor alpha
8
brucellosis serological
8
response treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!