Choice of therapy for breast cancer relies on human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and estrogen receptor α (ER) status. Before randomization in the phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation (ALTTO) trial for HER2-positive disease, HER2 and ER were centrally reviewed by Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, and Scottsdale, AZ) for North America and by the European Institute of Oncology (IEO; Milan, Italy) for the rest of world (except China). Discordance rates (local vs. central review) differed between Mayo and IEO. Among locally HER2-positive cases, 5.8 % (Mayo) and 14.5 % (IEO) were centrally HER2 negative. Among locally ER-positive cases, 16.2 % (Mayo) and 4.2 % (IEO) were centrally ER-negative. Among locally ER-negative cases, 3.4 % (Mayo) and 21.4 % (IEO) were centrally ER-positive. We, therefore, performed a ring study to identify features contributing to these differing discordance rates. Mayo and IEO exchanged slides for 25 HER2 and 35 ER locally/centrally discordant cases. Both laboratories performed IHC and FISH for HER2 using the HercepTest(®) and PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit/HER2/centromere 17 probe mixture. IHC for ER was tested centrally using the monoclonal ER 1D5 antibody (Mayo) or the DAKO cocktail of ER 1D5 and 2.123 antibodies (IEO). Mayo and IEO confirmed the central HER2-negative result in 100 % of 25 cases. Mayo and IEO confirmed the central ER result in 29 (85 %) of 34 evaluable cases. The five Mayo-negative/IEO-positive cases were ER-positive when retested at Mayo using the DAKO ER cocktail. In this ring study, ALTTO ineligibility did not change when HER2 testing was performed by either IEO or Mayo central laboratories. However, a dual antibody ER assay had fewer false-negative test results than an assay with a single antibody, and there was more discordance between the two ER reagents than has been previously reported. Using even slightly different assay methods yielded different results, even between experienced central laboratories.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039190PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2827-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mayo ieo
20
ring study
12
cases mayo
12
ieo centrally
12
mayo
11
ieo
10
her2
8
breast cancer
8
altto trial
8
discordance rates
8

Similar Publications

Objective: No biomarkers are available to predict treatment response in patients with endometrial cancers who undergo fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of molecular classification.

Methods: Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent fertility-sparing treatment with progestins between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively identified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The optimal treatment for patients with cervical stromal invasion (CSI) in endometrial cancer (EC) remains unclear. We aimed to test the prognostic role of molecular classification in EC patients with CSI.

Methods: A retrospective, multicenter review of EC patients with CSI was performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dual anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade has improved the outcomes of patients with early and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Here we present the final 10-year analysis of the ALTTO trial.

Patients And Methods: The ALTTO trial (NCT00490139) is a prospective randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter study that investigated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab alone, in combination or sequentially with lapatinib.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) has been validated in surgical oncology as a composite quality measure correlated with oncologic outcomes. We aimed to assess the association between TOO and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing primary treatment for advanced epithelial tubo-ovarian cancer (AEOC).

Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for AEOC between 2008 and 2019 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sex dependence of postoperative pulmonary complications - A post hoc unmatched and matched analysis of LAS VEGAS.

J Clin Anesth

December 2024

Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to investigate whether there are differences in postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) between males and females following surgery under general anesthesia, using data from the LAS VEGAS study involving 146 hospitals across 29 countries.
  • A total of 9,697 patients were analyzed in two cohorts: an unmatched cohort (55.1% female, 44.9% male) and a matched cohort (50% female and male), finding no significant differences in PPC rates between the genders in both cohorts.
  • The study concluded that, in this international patient population, the incidence of PPCs did not differ significantly between males and females, as well as noting comparable hospital stays and mortality rates.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!