Isolated small bowel transplantation outcomes and the impact of immunosuppressants: Experience of a single transplant center.

World J Transplant

Ibtesam A Hilmi, Raymond M Planinsic, Daniela Damian, Tetsuro Sakai, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.

Published: December 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study reviewed data from 77 patients who underwent isolated small bowel transplants over 8 years to assess the impact of different immunosuppressant induction agents on patient and graft outcomes.
  • - Results showed high one-year patient survival (95%) and graft survival (86%), with no significant differences in outcomes based on the type of immunosuppressant used (Zenapax, Thymoglobulin, Campath).
  • - Although certain immunosuppressant agents affected intraoperative management and short-term renal function, they did not influence long-term survival rates or the incidence of rejection or infection in the initial postoperative period.

Article Abstract

Aim: To investigate patient and graft outcomes in isolated small bowel transplant (SBTx) recipients and immunosuppressant induction agent impact on outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of the perioperative data of patients who underwent SBTx transplant during an 8-year period was conducted. The intraoperative data were: patient demographics, etiology of short gut syndrome, hemodynamic parameters, coagulation profiles, intraoperative fluid and blood products transfused, and development of post-reperfusion. The postoperative data were: hospital/intensive care unit stays, duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative incidence of acute kidney injury, and 1-year patient and graft outcomes. The effects of the three immunosuppressant induction agents (Zenapax, Thymoglobulin, Campath) on patient and graft outcomes were reviewed.

Results: During the 8-year period there were 77 patients; 1-year patient and graft survival were 95% and 86% respectively. Sixteen patients received Zenapax, 22 received Thymoglobulin, and 39 received Campath without effects on patient or graft survival (P = 0.90, P = 0.14, respectively). The use of different immune induction agents did not affect the incidence of rejection and infection during the first 90 postoperative days (P = 0.072, P = 0.29, respectively). The Zenapax group received more intraoperative fluid and blood products and were coagulopathic at the end of surgery. Zenapax and Thymoglobulin significantly increased serum creatinine at 48 h (P = 0.023) and 1 wk (P = 0.001) post-transplant, but none developed renal failure or required dialysis at the end of the first year.

Conclusion: One-year patient and graft survival were 95% and 86%, respectively. The use of different immunosuppressant induction agents may affect the intraoperative course and short-term postoperative morbidities, but not 1-year patient and graft outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3879522PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v3.i4.127DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient graft
28
graft outcomes
16
immunosuppressant induction
12
1-year patient
12
induction agents
12
graft survival
12
isolated small
8
small bowel
8
patient
8
8-year period
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!