Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and solitary lymph node metastasis.

World J Gastroenterol

Chun-Qiu Chen, Zhen Yu, Ke-Qiang Zuo, Department of General Surgery, Tenth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China.

Published: December 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to examine how solitary lymph node metastasis (SLNM) and age affect survival rates in gastric cancer patients.
  • The research involved analyzing medical records of 936 gastric cancer patients with SLNM who underwent surgery, focusing on their age and metastatic lymph node ratios for survival outcomes over time.
  • Results showed that younger patients (≤ 50 years old) had significantly lower survival rates compared to older patients, and those with higher metastatic lymph node ratios experienced shorter survival times overall.

Article Abstract

Aim: To investigate the relationship of solitary lymph node metastasis (SLNM) and age with patient survival in gastric cancer (GC).

Methods: The medical records databases of China's Beijing Cancer Hospital at the Peking University School of Oncology and Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital affiliated to Tongji University were searched retrospectively to identify patients with histologically proven GC and SLNM who underwent surgical resection between October 2003 and December 2012. Patients with distant metastasis or gastric stump carcinoma following resection for benign disease were excluded from the analysis. In total, 936 patients with GC + SLNM were selected for analysis and the recorded parameters of clinicopathological disease and follow-up (range: 13-2925 d) were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to stratify patients by age (≤ 50 years-old, n = 198; 50-64 years-old, n = 321; ≥ 65 years-old, n = 446) and by metastatic lymph node ratio [MLR < 0.04 (1/25), n = 180; 0.04-0.06 (1/25-1/15), n = 687; ≥ 0.06 (1/15), n = 98] for 5-year survival analysis. The significance of intergroup differences between the survival curves was assessed by a log-rank test.

Results: The 5-year survival rate of the entire GC + SLNM patient population was 49.9%. Stratification analysis showed significant differences in survival time (post-operative days) according to age: ≤ 50 years-old: 950.7 ± 79.0 vs 50-64 years-old: 1697.8 ± 65.9 vs ≥ 65 years-old: 1996.2 ± 57.6, all P < 0.05. In addition, younger age (≤ 50 years-old) correlated significantly with mean survival time (r = 0.367, P < 0.001). Stratification analysis also indicated an inverse relationship between increasing MLR and shorter survival time: < 0.04: 52.8% and 0.04-0.06: 51.1% vs ≥ 0.06: 40.5%, P < 0.05. The patients with the shortest survival times and rates were younger and had a high MLR (≥ 0.06): ≤ 50 years-old: 496.4 ± 133.0 and 0.0% vs 50-65 years-old: 1180.9 ± 201.8 and 21.4% vs ≥ 65 years-old: 1538.4 ± 72.4 and 37.3%, all P < 0.05. The same significant trend in shorter survival times and rates for younger patients was seen with the mid-range MLR group (0.04-0.06), but the difference between the two older groups was not significant. No significant differences were found between the age groups of patients with MLR < 0.04. Assessment of clinicopathological parameters identified age group, Borrmann type, histological type and tumor depth as the most important predictors of the survival rates and times observed for this study population.

Conclusion: GC patients below 51 years of age with MLR of SLNM above 0.06 have shorter life expectancy than their older counterparts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870506PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8611DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

≤ years-old
16
lymph node
12
age ≤
12
≥ years-old
12
≥ 006
12
survival time
12
survival
10
years-old
10
gastric cancer
8
solitary lymph
8

Similar Publications

Background: The purpose of our study was to investigate the association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) progression using non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA).

Methods: Patients with AAA and age- and sex-matched healthy subjects who underwent abdominal CTA and non-enhanced CT examination between January 2015 and January 2023 from four hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with AAA were divided into progression (growth rate > 10 mL/year) and non-progression groups, as well as those with NAFLD and without NAFLD, based on abdominal CT results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) represents a pivotal advancement in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

Objective: The primary objective of this study is to present a comprehensive overview of the EVAR service in a district-level vascular centre and to compare it with the national outcome to outline a service model for other district general hospitals.

Method: Patients who underwent an EVAR procedure from 2015 over seven years were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) increases with age. Previous trials confirm that elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an effective intervention for AAA. However, few elderly patients were recruited into randomized trials, whereas in contemporary clinical practice, elective repair is commonly performed on octogenarians.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To report the midterm clinical outcomes from the GORE® EXCLUDER® Conformable AAA Endoprosthesis system (EXCC) pivotal regulatory trial in the United States (U.S.).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk factor-targeted abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: systematic review of risk prediction for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Br J Surg

August 2024

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Article Synopsis
  • This study looked at how well doctors can predict who might get an abdominal aortic aneurysm, which is a problem with a blood vessel in the belly.
  • They found 37 models that try to predict this risk, but only 4 were really different and good enough to use.
  • Common risk factors include age, smoking, and health problems like high blood pressure, but none of these models have been tested in a real-world situation yet.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!