Sexual risk trajectories among MSM in the United States: implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery.

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

Departments of *Epidemiology; †Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Departments of ‡Family Medicine; §Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; ‖Center for Clinical AIDS Research & Education, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; ¶David Ostrow & Associates, LLC Chicago, IL; #The Chicago MACS, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL; **Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and ††Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Published: April 2014

Background: Despite evidence supporting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) efficacy, there are concerns regarding the feasibility of widespread PrEP implementation among men who have sex with men (MSM). To inform the development of targeted PrEP delivery guidelines, sexual risk trajectories among HIV-negative MSM were characterized.

Methods: At semiannual visits from 2003 to 2011, HIV-negative MSM (N = 419) participating in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study provided data on sexual risk behaviors (SRBs) since their last visit. Based on their reported behaviors, participants were assigned a SRB score at each visit as follows: 0 = no insertive or receptive anal intercourse, 1 = no unprotected insertive or receptive anal intercourse, 2 = only unprotected insertive anal intercourse, 3 = unprotected receptive anal intercourse with 1 HIV-negative partner, 4 = condom serosorting, 5 = condom seropositioning, and 6 = no seroadaptive behaviors. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to examine SRB scores (<4 vs. ≥4) and identify groups with distinct sexual risk trajectories.

Results: Three sexual risk trajectory groups were identified: low-risk (n = 264; 63.0%), moderate-risk (n = 96; 22.9%; mean duration of consecutive high-risk intervals ∼1 year), and high-risk (n = 59; 14.1%; mean duration of consecutive high-risk intervals ∼2 years). Compared to low-risk group membership, high-risk group membership was associated with younger age (in years) [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88 to 0.96], being White (AOR = 3.67, 95% CI: 1.48 to 9.11), earning an income ≥$20,000 (AOR = 4.98, 95% CI: 2.13 to 11.64), distress/depression symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ≥ 16) (AOR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14 to 4.92), and substance use (AOR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.01 to 3.97).

Conclusions: Screening for the sociodemographic and behavioral factors described above may facilitate targeted PrEP delivery during high-risk periods among MSM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4026016PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000101DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anal intercourse
16
sexual risk
12
receptive anal
12
intercourse unprotected
12
risk trajectories
8
pre-exposure prophylaxis
8
hiv-negative msm
8
insertive receptive
8
unprotected insertive
8
msm
4

Similar Publications

Anal HPV infection is particularly prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM). The purpose of this study was to understand the status and influencing factors of HPV infection in MSM in Urumqi, Xinjiang, in order to provide suggestions for policy formulation. A prospective cohort study was conducted among HIV-negative MSM in Urumqi Xinjiang between April 2016 and June 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Predictors of HIV testing adherence among men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional study.

BMC Public Health

January 2025

General and Specialized Nursing Department, Graduate Program in Fundamental Nursing, Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Riberão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Men who have sex with men are a target group for HIV prevention and control. HIV testing is part of a broader combination prevention strategy. This study aimed to analyze the predictors for adherence to HIV infection testing among Brazilian men who have sex with men.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Non-colorectal Cancer Screening and Vaccinations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Review.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

January 2025

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville FL. Electronic address:

Description: The aim of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to provide best practice advice (BPA) statements for gastroenterologists and other health care providers who provide care to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The focus is on IBD-specific screenings (excluding colorectal cancer screening, which is discussed separately) and vaccinations. We provide guidance to ensure that patients are up to date with the disease-specific cancer screenings, vaccinations, as well as advice for mental health and general wellbeing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!