Exposure to media information about a disease can cause doctors to misdiagnose similar-looking clinical cases.

Acad Med

Prof. Dr. Schmidt is professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Dr. Mamede is associate professor, Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus Medical Center, and associate professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Dr. van den Berge is resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Prof. Dr. van Gog is professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Prof. Dr. van Saase is professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Prof. Dr. Rikers is professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Published: February 2014

Purpose: Anecdotal evidence indicates that exposure to media-distributed disease information, such as news about an outbreak, can lead physicians to errors; influenced by an availability bias, they misdiagnose patients with similar-looking but different diseases. The authors investigated whether exposure to media-provided disease information causes diagnostic errors and whether reflection (systematic review of findings) counteracts bias.

Method: In 2010, 38 internal medicine residents first read the Wikipedia entry about one or another of two diseases (Phase 1). Six hours later, in a seemingly unrelated study, they diagnosed eight clinical cases (Phase 2). Two cases superficially resembled the disease in the Wikipedia entry they had read (bias expected), two cases resembled the other disease they had not read about (bias not expected), and four were filler cases. In Phase 3, they diagnosed the bias-expected cases again, using reflective reasoning.

Results: Mean diagnostic accuracy scores (Phase 2; range: 0-1) were significantly lower on bias-expected cases than on bias-not-expected cases (0.56 versus 0.70, P = .016) because participants misdiagnosed cases that looked similar to a Wikipedia description of a disease more often when they had read the Wikipedia description (mean = 0.61) than when they had not (mean = 0.29). Deliberate reflection (Phase 3) restored performance on bias-expected cases to pre-bias levels (mean = 0.71).

Conclusions: Availability bias may arise simply from exposure to media-provided information about a disease, causing diagnostic errors. The bias's effect can be substantial. It is apparently associated with nonanalytical reasoning and can be counteracted by reflection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000107DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bias-expected cases
12
cases
10
clinical cases
8
availability bias
8
exposure media-provided
8
media-provided disease
8
diagnostic errors
8
read wikipedia
8
wikipedia entry
8
cases phase
8

Similar Publications

Exposure to media information about a disease can cause doctors to misdiagnose similar-looking clinical cases.

Acad Med

February 2014

Prof. Dr. Schmidt is professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Dr. Mamede is associate professor, Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus Medical Center, and associate professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Dr. van den Berge is resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Prof. Dr. van Gog is professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Prof. Dr. van Saase is professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Prof. Dr. Rikers is professor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Purpose: Anecdotal evidence indicates that exposure to media-distributed disease information, such as news about an outbreak, can lead physicians to errors; influenced by an availability bias, they misdiagnose patients with similar-looking but different diseases. The authors investigated whether exposure to media-provided disease information causes diagnostic errors and whether reflection (systematic review of findings) counteracts bias.

Method: In 2010, 38 internal medicine residents first read the Wikipedia entry about one or another of two diseases (Phase 1).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Notification of bacterial meningitis (BM) is likely to be incomplete, and a recent Danish study indicated that unbalanced notification may bias expected aetiology of BM. Therefore the Danish Bacterial Meningitis Group initiated a national registration of culture-positive BM.

Methods: Laboratory data on all bacterial isolates from cerebrospinal fluid deemed to be clinically relevant were identified on a national basis during 2002 and 2003.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!