Uncovertebral anatomic midline targeting for cervical disc arthroplasty.

Global Spine J

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Published: March 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study is a prospective observational cohort designed to assess the accuracy of using uncovertebral anatomical targeting for cervical disc arthroplasty placement.
  • In a sample of 40 patients, the results showed an average deviation from the ideal midline placement of only 0.7 mm, indicating high precision in implant positioning.
  • The technique reduces the need for extensive imaging resources and minimizes X-ray exposure for both patients and the surgical team.

Article Abstract

Study Design Prospective observational cohort. Objective To document the accuracy of uncovertebral anatomic targeting in positioning cervical disc arthroplasty. Summary of Background Data Disc arthroplasty implants depend on midline placement for optimum mechanical function. Fluoroscopy is used to delineate the midline. Anatomic targeting from the uncovertebral joints in the neck may be adequate. We have investigated the efficacy of uncovertebral anatomic targeting for cervical disc arthroplasty. Methods Anatomic uncovertebral midline targeting for disc arthroplasty insertion was performed in 18 male (mean age 51 years, range 27 to 67) and 22 female (mean age 50, range 35 to 70) patients receiving a total of 59 implants over a 5-year period. Device insertion was under only lateral imaging control. Postinsertion operative fluoroscopy with optimized centering was used to record implant position in the anteroposterior plane, and centerline analysis was performed using cursor measurement technology from the GE PACS™ imaging system (GE Medical Systems, Mt. Prospect, IL). Results Analysis found a mean deviation from the ideal midline placement of only 0.7 mm (range, 0 to 2.9 mm). Only three devices were more than 2 mm off the anatomic midline. Conclusion This anatomic technique is effective, safely minimizing imaging resource needs and X-ray exposure to the patient and operating team.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864439PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1307259DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disc arthroplasty
16
uncovertebral anatomic
12
cervical disc
12
anatomic targeting
12
anatomic midline
8
midline targeting
8
targeting cervical
8
midline placement
8
midline
6
uncovertebral
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!