A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Rapid significant weight loss and regional lipid deposition: Implications for insulin sensitivity. | LitMetric

Aim: To compare regional lipid deposition and insulin sensitivity after differing weight loss strategies: very low calorie diet (VLCD) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).

Method: Thirty-nine obese women underwent anthropometry, proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy for assessment of liver fat (LFAT) and MR imaging for visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous abdominal fat volume (SAT) determination. Fasting blood was taken for insulin, glucose and free fatty acid (FFA) analysis. Measurements were repeated after 6-weeks Optifast VLCD (n = 14) or 3 months after LAGB (n = 25).

Results: Similar, significant (p < 0.001) weight loss occurred after VLCD (8%) and LAGB (9%). Both interventions induced significant (p < 0.001) and similar reductions in body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference, and in SAT and VAT (VLCD p < 0.05, LAGB p < 0.001). LFAT fell only after VLCD (p < 0.05). Plasma FFA only fell after LAGB (p < 0.05). Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-R) improved only following VLCD (p < 0.05). No relations were detected between the changes in LFAT, VAT and SAT. The change in LFAT related to the change in HOMA-R in both interventions combined (r = 0.410, p = 0.013) and in the VLCD group (r = 0.660, p = 0.020). There was no change in relative dietary fat intake after LAGB (p = 0.11).

Conclusion: Caloric and fat restriction for 6 weeks (VLCD) reduces weight, SAT, VAT, LFAT and HOMA-R. Less severe caloric restriction for 12 weeks (LAGB) causes significant loss of weight, VAT and SAT but no detectable change in LFAT and HOMA-R. Following weight loss, a change in LFAT is related more to changes in insulin sensitivity or dietary fat than to abdominal adiposity loss.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2006.08.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weight loss
16
insulin sensitivity
12
vlcd 005
12
change lfat
12
regional lipid
8
lipid deposition
8
vlcd
8
sat vat
8
vat sat
8
dietary fat
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!