Objective: Interpersonal trauma and violence is currently considered a global public health emergency. However, studies have not differentiated between intimate interpersonal trauma and nonintimate interpersonal trauma in their impact on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology. This cross-sectional study based on epidemiologic data examined the differential likelihoods of endorsing PTSD symptoms following 3 categories of trauma: noninterpersonal (eg, accidents, natural disasters), nonintimate interpersonal (physical assaults perpetrated by nonintimates), and intimate interpersonal (physical assaults perpetrated by intimates or caregivers and sexual assaults).

Method: DSM-IV PTSD symptom data drawn from a weighted subsample (N = 1,012) of people reporting "most severe" reactions following one of the above types of trauma in the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being (NSMHWB) were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

Results: Participants reporting intimate interpersonal compared with noninterpersonal trauma were significantly (P < .001) more likely to endorse core symptoms (intrusive reexperiencing, avoidance of reminders, hypervigilance, and startle response) of PTSD. The intimate interpersonal trauma group members were significantly more likely than the nonintimate interpersonal trauma group members to endorse distress at reminders (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2; P < .001; 99.7% CI, 1.3-7.9), avoiding thinking about the event (OR = 3.2; P < .001; 99.7% CI, 1.3-7.7), detachment from others (OR = 3.2; P < .001; 99.7% CI, 1.2-8.9), and restricted affect (OR = 4.1; P < .001; 99.7% CI, 1.5-11.3). Participants reporting nonintimate interpersonal and noninterpersonal traumas did not significantly differ except in endorsement of behavioral avoidance (OR = 2.8; P < .001; 99.7% CI, 1.2-6.6), hypervigilance (OR = 2.5; P = .002; 99.7% CI, 1.0-6.3), and exaggerated startle response (OR = 3.5; P < .001; 99.7% CI, 1.7-7.4).

Conclusions: Survivors of intimate trauma appear to experience particularly severe intrusive memories and reminders of past trauma and suppression of emotional responsivity. The unique impact of interpersonal trauma, however, intimate or otherwise, compared with noninterpersonal trauma, is the experience of an environment as unsafe and unpredictable, due to the potential of human threat. Such findings have significant implications for the assessment of and interventions for survivors of interpersonal violence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.13m08374DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interpersonal trauma
24
001 997%
24
nonintimate interpersonal
20
intimate interpersonal
16
trauma
14
interpersonal
12
noninterpersonal trauma
12
interpersonal noninterpersonal
8
interpersonal physical
8
physical assaults
8

Similar Publications

Childhood abuse represents one of the most potent risk factors for the development of psychopathology during childhood, accounting for 30-60% of the risk for onset. While previous studies have separately associated reductions in gray matter volume (GMV) with childhood abuse and internalizing psychopathology (IP), it is unclear whether abuse and IP differ in their structural abnormalities, and which GMV features are related to abuse and IP at the individual level. In a pooled multisite, multi-investigator sample, 246 child and adolescent females between the ages of 8-18 were recruited into studies of interpersonal violence (IPV) and/or IP (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We propose that historical myths fall into two distinctive categories: Traumatic and cooperative. Traumatic myths, highlighting collective suffering, can undermine trust and foster conspiracy theories, whereas cooperative myths, emphasizing collective action, enhance group cohesion and within-group coalition building. Psychological and sociological evidence supports these divergent impacts of historical myths both in nations and social movements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Examining Factors Influencing Older Adult Engagement in Fall Prevention: A Comparative Analysis Among Stakeholders.

J Am Geriatr Soc

December 2024

The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking in Health Services and Implementation Science Research (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Falls are a significant issue for older adults in the U.S., often leading to severe injuries and affecting their health and independence; thus, understanding barriers to engaging in fall prevention interventions is crucial.
  • Semi-structured focus groups with 59 participants (older adults, caregivers, healthcare providers) revealed various barriers categorized by the social-ecological model, pinpointing individual, interpersonal, community, and societal influences.
  • Key barriers at the individual level included denial and fear of being a burden, while community-level barriers encompassed cost and limited resources; addressing these insights can help create effective strategies to promote fall prevention and healthy aging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although psychological interventions can be effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder, some patients' symptoms persist or rapidly recur after therapy. This study aimed to synthesize research findings on predictors and moderators of treatment response for persisting forms of depression, such as chronic, recurrent, and treatment-resistant depression.

Methods: A systematic review of studies investigating predictors and moderators of response to outpatient psychological treatment for adults with persisting forms of depression was conducted by searching Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Despite the prevalence and harmful consequences of interpersonal violence and the growth in intervention research, applying research evidence and strategies into practice remains limited. This systematic review addresses this gap by using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) to characterize barriers and facilitators in efforts to prevent and address interpersonal violence. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and APA PsycInfo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!