[Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a meta analysis].

Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue

Department of Urology, Medical Center for Overseas Patients, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.

Published: November 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (TLRP) and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) for localized prostate cancer.
  • Nine clinical trials involving 942 cases were analyzed, revealing no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, catheterization time, or hospital stay between TLRP and ELRP.
  • However, ELRP was found to allow for quicker recovery of intestinal function compared to TLRP, making it a superior option in that respect.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects and safety of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (TLRP) and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang and CBM for clinical controlled trials addressing TLRP and ELRP in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Two independent reviewers extracted comparable data from eligible studies and performed meta-analysis with the Statal 2.0 software on the relevant indexes of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative catheterization, postoperative intestinal function recovery, and postoperative hospital stay.

Results: Nine clinical controlled trials with 942 cases were included in this analysis, 492 treated by TLRP and the other 450 by ELRP. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the TLRP and ELRP groups in operation time (SMD = 0.60, 95% CI: -0.06,1.26), intraoperative blood loss (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.35, 0.36) , postoperative catheterization time (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.21, 0.40) and postoperative hospital stay (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: -0.01, 0.91), except in the time of postoperative intestinal function recovery, which was significantly shorter in the ELRP than in the TLRP group (SMD = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.26, 2.10).

Conclusion: For the treatment of localized prostate cancer, ELRP is similar to TLRP with respect to operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative catheterization and postoperative hospital stay, but superior to the latter in postoperative intestinal function recovery.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

localized prostate
16
laparoscopic radical
12
radical prostatectomy
12
prostate cancer
12
treatment localized
12
operation time
12
intraoperative blood
12
blood loss
12
postoperative catheterization
12
postoperative intestinal
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!