A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of eye movements pattern during reading process in patients with glaucoma: a microperimeter study. | LitMetric

Purpose: To assess eye movements pattern during reading process in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using a microperimeter.

Methods: Thirty-two patients with POAG at early and moderate stage, according to Glaucoma Staging System 2, and 34 healthy age- and sex-matched subjects were included in the study. Reading speed and accuracy were previously evaluated with specific tests adjusted for age. In addition, all participants performed a reading test with Microperimeter Nidek MP1. Ocular movements during the reading process were recorded and values of maximum and minimum eye movements along the horizontal (Xmax and Xmin) and vertical (Ymax and Ymin) axis and mean ocular movement speed were provided by the MP1.

Results: There were significant differences between patients with and without POAG in terms of Xmax and Ymax eye movement values (4.75 ± 2.57 versus 3.38 ± 0.67, p = 0.003; and 4.39 ± 1.43 versus 3.34 ± 0.52, p<0.001, respectively). These differences were significant even comparing only stage 1 patients to controls. There were no significant differences in Xmin and Ymin values and mean ocular movement speed between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: The study showed significant differences in eye movements pattern in patients with POAG during the reading test performed with the MP1 when compared to the control group. These alterations may be partly the consequence of the neurodegenerative process of the central visual pathway in glaucoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000397DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eye movements
12
reading process
12
movements pattern
8
pattern reading
8
process patients
8
patients poag
8
reading
5
evaluation eye
4
movements
4
patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!