Background: The objective of the study is to study surgical site infection (SSI) rates and risk factors in a pediatric population.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study to estimate the SSI rate at a national pediatric referral center, covering all patients managed at the Orthopedic Surgery Department of the Niño Jesús Children's University Teaching Hospital from January 2010 through December 2012. Risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis were monitored. A comparison between Spanish and US data was performed, with a breakdown by National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk indices. We also conducted a comparative study of SSI rates from 2010 to 2012 to assess the impact of the epidemiologic surveillance system.
Results: The study population of 1079 patients had a SSI rate of 2.8%. SSI rates were calculated for spinal fusion and other musculoskeletal procedures according to the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index. In the case of other musculoskeletal procedures, our SSI rates were 0.8 times lower than the overall Spanish rate, but higher than US rates for all risk categories. For spinal fusion procedures, our SSI rates were 1.2 times higher than the Spanish rates and 3.5 times higher than National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance rates. This latter finding should be interpreted with caution because it was based on a small sample. The multivariate analysis indicated that the only predictive factors of SSI were American Society of Anesthesiologists score and age.
Conclusions: The surveillance program showed that for clean procedures, SSI incidence decreased from 4% in 2010 to 3.2% in 2011 and to 2.4% in 2012.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000000232 | DOI Listing |
OTA Int
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the utility of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Surgical Wound Classification (SWC) in predicting surgical site infection (SSI) after orthopaedic trauma procedures.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Level I academic trauma center.
J Am Coll Surg
January 2025
Department of Surgery, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Novant Health, Wilmington, NC.
Background: Patients with large pannus and ventral hernias may benefit from undergoing panniculectomy performed concurrently with open ventral hernia repair (VHR-PAN). However, there has been concerns related to increase surgical site occurrences when adding a panniculectomy. This study aims to evaluate outcomes of open VHR with and without panniculectomy using a large hernia specific database.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Coll Surg
February 2025
From the Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Antoniv, Ahmed, Bleday).
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve surgical patient outcomes, although their effectiveness may vary. This study assessed the impact of multi-institutional ERAS implementation on postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
Study Design: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2012 to 2020.
Iowa Orthop J
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners for Children Medical Center, Pasadena, California, USA.
Background: The use of vancomycin powder in spine surgery has been supported in adult populations, however, its efficacy in preventing postoperative surgical site infections in AIS patients is yet to be determined.
Methods: A multi-center review was conducted from June 2010 to February 2019, using ICD and CPT codes to identify AIS patients who underwent primary PSF. The patients were divided into two groups: the vancomycin cohort (receiving local vancomycin powder prior to wound closure) and the non-vancomycin cohort.
F1000Res
January 2025
Almoosa Specialist Hospital, Al Ahsa, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Background: The practice of preoperative hair removal has been debated regarding its role in Surgical Site Infection (SSI) prevention. This study aimed to compare the different hair removing modalities and investigate the effect of preoperative hair removal on SSI rates.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!