Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

J Clin Oncol

Daniel D. Buchanan, Yen Y. Tan, Michael D. Walsh, Mark Clendenning, Alexander M. Metcalf, Kaltin Ferguson, Sven T. Arnold, Bryony A. Thompson, Felicity A. Lose, Michael T. Parsons, Rhiannon J. Walters, Sally-Ann Pearson, Joanne P. Young, Penelope M. Webb, and Amanda B. Spurdle, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Yen Y. Tan and Andreas Obermair, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane; Margaret Cummings, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Queensland; Martin K. Oehler, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia; Michael A. Quinn, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria; Judy A. Kirk, Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales; Colin J. Stewart, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; and Penelope B. Blomfield, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania.

Published: January 2014

Purpose: Clinicopathologic data from a population-based endometrial cancer cohort, unselected for age or family history, were analyzed to determine the optimal scheme for identification of patients with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations.

Patients And Methods: Endometrial cancers from 702 patients recruited into the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for MLH1 gene promoter methylation in MLH1-deficient cases. MMR mutation testing was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR-protein deficient tumors. Prediction of germline mutation status was compared for combinations of tumor characteristics, age at diagnosis, and various clinical criteria (Amsterdam, Bethesda, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, ANECS).

Results: Tumor MMR-protein deficiency was detected in 170 (24%) of 702 cases. Germline testing of 158 MMR-deficient cases identified 22 truncating mutations (3% of all cases) and four unclassified variants. Tumor MLH1 methylation was detected in 99 (89%) of 111 cases demonstrating MLH1/PMS2 IHC loss; all were germline MLH1 mutation negative. A combination of MMR IHC plus MLH1 methylation testing in women younger than 60 years of age at diagnosis provided the highest positive predictive value for the identification of mutation carriers at 46% versus ≤ 41% for any other criteria considered.

Conclusion: Population-level identification of patients with MMR mutation-positive endometrial cancer is optimized by stepwise testing for tumor MMR IHC loss in patients younger than 60 years, tumor MLH1 methylation in individuals with MLH1 IHC loss, and germline mutations in patients exhibiting loss of MSH6, MSH2, or PMS2 or loss of MLH1/PMS2 with absence of MLH1 methylation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876359PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.51.2129DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mlh1 methylation
20
endometrial cancer
16
mismatch repair
12
younger years
12
ihc loss
12
mlh1
8
methylation testing
8
germline mismatch
8
mutation testing
8
identification patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!