Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial.

J Natl Cancer Inst

Affiliations of authors: "Sandra Pitigliani" Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy (ADL, LM); Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman and Liège University, Liège, Belgium (GJ); Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (LP); Clinical Oncology, Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago, Chile (RT); Dnipropetrovsk Municipal Clinical Hospital, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine (INB); Republican Clinical Oncological Center, Kazan, Russia (RK); AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium (DV); Mastology, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil (JLP); Thoracal Department, Medical Radiological Science Center, Obninsk, Russia (IS); Chemotherapy and Combined Therapy, Russian Cancer Research Centre, Moscow, Russia (MRL); Medical Oncology, Kansas City Cancer Center, Kansas City, MO USA (KP); AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK (SG, YR); Medical Oncology Service, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain (MM).

Published: January 2014

Background: At the time of the initial analysis of overall survival (OS) for the Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, approximately 50% of patients had died. A final analysis of OS was subsequently planned for when 75% of patients had died.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to fulvestrant 500 mg administered as two 5-mL intramuscular injections on days 0, 14, and 28 and every 28 (±3) days thereafter or fulvestrant 250 mg administered as two 5-mL intramuscular injections (one fulvestrant and one placebo [identical in appearance to study drug]) on days 0, 14 (two placebo injections only), and 28 and every 28 (±3) days thereafter. OS was analyzed using an unadjusted log-rank test. No adjustments were made for multiplicity. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and best response to subsequent therapy were also reported. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: In total, 736 women (median age = 61.0 years) were randomly assigned to fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 362) or 250 mg (n = 374). At the final survival analysis, 554 of 736 (75.3%) patients had died. Median OS was 26.4 months for fulvestrant 500 mg and 22.3 months for 250 mg (hazard ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval = 0.69-0.96; nominal P = .02). There were no clinically important differences in SAE profiles between the treatment groups; no clustering of SAEs could be detected in either treatment group. Type of first subsequent therapy and objective responses to first subsequent therapy were well balanced between the two treatment groups.

Conclusions: In patients with locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, fulvestrant 500 mg is associated with a 19% reduction in risk of death and a 4.1-month difference in median OS compared with fulvestrant 250 mg. Fulvestrant 500 mg was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906991PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt337DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fulvestrant 500
24
subsequent therapy
12
fulvestrant
9
final survival
8
breast cancer
8
patients died
8
randomly assigned
8
assigned fulvestrant
8
administered 5-ml
8
5-ml intramuscular
8

Similar Publications

The treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has radically changed over the last few years. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have become the standard of care as a front-line therapeutic approach, conferring a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to traditional endocrine therapy (ET) alone. However, the wide administration of these drugs in clinical practice paved the way for the emergence of new intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance that seem to compromise second-line treatment effectiveness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Alpelisib, a PI3Kα-selective inhibitor and degrader, plus fulvestrant showed efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in SOLAR-1; limited data are available in the post-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor setting. BYLieve aimed to assess alpelisib plus endocrine therapy in this setting in three cohorts defined by immediate previous treatment; here, we report results from cohort A.

Methods: This ongoing, phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study enrolled patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer with tumour PIK3CA mutation, following progression on or after previous therapy, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, from 114 study locations (cancer centres, medical centres, university hospitals, and hospitals) in 18 countries worldwide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The patient was a 60-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with hypertension, symptomatic epilepsy, renal failure, and cerebral infarction. During follow-up, she was found to have a mass in her left breast and was referred to our department.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Inhibition of the cyclin D-cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)4/6-INK4-retinoblastoma pathway can overcome acquired or de novo treatment resistance to endocrine monotherapy. Responses to endocrine monotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer (EC) are suboptimal, perhaps due to genomic alterations that promote estrogen receptor (ER)-independent cyclin D1-CDK4/6 activation. We hypothesized that addition of abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 kinase inhibitor, to antiestrogen therapy with fulvestrant will be an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The SERENA-2 trial investigates the efficacy of camizestrant, a new oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, compared to the traditional injectable SERD, fulvestrant, in treating advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in post-menopausal women.
  • This phase 2 trial includes patients who have experienced disease progression after previous endocrine therapies and assesses different dosages of camizestrant against fulvestrant, focusing on progression-free survival rates as the primary outcome.
  • Conducted across 74 centers worldwide, the study also monitors the safety and side effects of the treatments among all participants who received at least one dose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!