Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evaluated. The working hypothesis was that narrow-diameter implants offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter.

Material And Methods: A Medline-PubMed search covering the period between 2002 and 2012 was carried out. Studies published in English and with a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. A manual search was also conducted in different journals with an important impact factor. results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included in the literature review. A total of 2980 narrow-diameter implants placed in 1607 patients were analyzed.

Conclusions: The results obtained from the literature indicate that narrow-diameter implants are a predictable treatment option, since they afford clinical results comparable to those obtained with implants of greater diameter.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909436PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

narrow-diameter implants
20
literature review
12
implants predictable
8
predictable treatment
8
treatment option
8
clinical implants
8
implants greater
8
implants
7
narrow-diameter
5
treatment option?
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of one-piece narrow-diameter implants (NDIs), with diameters of 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm, and to investigate the factors that affect marginal bone loss (MBL) around these implants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To analyze the trends in the context of implant therapy in a 3-year patient population and compare it with data obtained over the last 20 years.

Materials And Methods: All adult subjects who received treatment in the context of implant therapy between 2020 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Data regarding patient demographics, indications and location of implant therapy, implant characteristics, surgical techniques, complications, and early implant failures were recorded and compared to data obtained in the years 2002-2004, 2008-2010, and 2014-2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the survival rates and risk factors associated with Resorbable Blast Media (RBM) surface dental implants. The study involved 1,130 implants placed in 260 patients, with a follow-up ranging from a minimum of 26 months to a maximum of 120 months, for an average of 60 months.

Materials And Methods: 1,130 RBM surface implants with hybrid macro-geometry were placed in 260 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Bone density is an important factor for long-term implant success. Peri-implant bone density evaluation before implant placement can be useful for treatment planning, such as the selection of proper implant size or drilling protocol in each case. In this study, we aimed to establish an objective intraoperative bone density evaluation method by measuring the drilling torque value using a newly designed density measurement drill.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The goal of successful implant placement is to maintain a long-term stable marginal peri-implant bone level (MBL). This retrospective study investigated the MBL of reduceddiameter implants (RDI). The implants were analyzed in different indication in the context of various surgical and prosthetic treatment strategies using heterogeneous data from a private practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!