A prospective, randomized study comparing 150 patients undergoing laparoscopic operations (110 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholesystectomy and 40 patients laparoscopic fundoplication) with standard CO2 insufflation vs those receiving warmed, humidified CO2 was performed. All patients were randomized into 2 groups - 84 receiving standard CO2 insufflation (control group) and 66 receiving warmed, humidified CO2 (main group). Main variables included patient core temperature, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements and other postoperative dates. We revaeled that warmed, humidified CO2 has advantages that were statistically significant. Patients undergoing warmed, humidified carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation for maintain a warmer intraoperative core temperature, and have less postoperative pain and need less analgesic requirements than patients with standard CO2 insufflation.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

co2 insufflation
16
warmed humidified
16
patients undergoing
12
standard co2
12
humidified co2
12
co2
8
undergoing laparoscopic
8
receiving warmed
8
core temperature
8
temperature postoperative
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!