Characterisation of ethylene pathway components in non-climacteric capsicum.

BMC Plant Biol

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond SA 5064, Australia.

Published: November 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • Capsicum fruit, unlike climacteric fruits like tomatoes, do not ripen in response to ethylene and require specific harvesting stages (like the 'Breaker stage') for normal ripening.
  • The study found limited expression of various ethylene pathway components (ACO, ACS, and ETR) during capsicum ripening, with only one ACO isoform (CaACO4) showing notable activity.
  • Treatments with ethylene did not promote ripening, while the inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene delayed it, indicating that ACS activity may limit the ethylene pathway's function in capsicum.

Article Abstract

Background: Climacteric fruit exhibit high ethylene and respiration levels during ripening but these levels are limited in non-climacteric fruit. Even though capsicum is in the same family as the well-characterised climacteric tomato (Solanaceae), it is non-climacteric and does not ripen normally in response to ethylene or if harvested when mature green. However, ripening progresses normally in capsicum fruit when they are harvested during or after what is called the 'Breaker stage'. Whether ethylene, and components of the ethylene pathway such as 1-aminocyclopropane 1-carboxylate (ACC) oxidase (ACO), ACC synthase (ACS) and the ethylene receptor (ETR), contribute to non-climacteric ripening in capsicum has not been studied in detail. To elucidate the behaviour of ethylene pathway components in capsicum during ripening, further analysis is therefore needed. The effects of ethylene or inhibitors of ethylene perception, such as 1-methylcyclopropene, on capsicum fruit ripening and the ethylene pathway components may also shed some light on the role of ethylene in non-climacteric ripening.

Results: The expression of several isoforms of ACO, ACS and ETR were limited during capsicum ripening except one ACO isoform (CaACO4). ACS activity and ACC content were also low in capsicum despite the increase in ACO activity during the onset of ripening. Ethylene did not stimulate capsicum ripening but 1-methylcyclopropene treatment delayed the ripening of Breaker-harvested fruit. Some of the ACO, ACS and ETR isoforms were also differentially expressed upon treatment with ethylene or 1-methylcyclopropene.

Conclusions: ACS activity may be the rate limiting step in the ethylene pathway of capsicum which restricts ACC content. The differential expression of several ethylene pathway components during ripening and upon ethylene or 1-methylclopropene treatment suggests that the ethylene pathway may be regulated differently in non-climacteric capsicum compared to the climacteric tomato. Ethylene independent pathways may also exist in non-climacteric ripening as evidenced by the up-regulation of CaACO4 during ripening onset despite being negatively regulated by ethylene exposure. However, some level of ethylene perception may still be needed to induce ripening especially during the Breaker stage. A model of capsicum ripening is also presented to illustrate the probable role of ethylene in this non-climacteric fruit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219378PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-191DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ethylene pathway
28
ethylene
20
pathway components
16
capsicum ripening
16
ripening
14
capsicum
12
ripening ethylene
12
non-climacteric
8
non-climacteric capsicum
8
non-climacteric fruit
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!