Emotional reactions of peers influence decisions about fairness in adolescence.

Front Hum Neurosci

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Curium - Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden, Netherlands ; Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.

Published: November 2013

During adolescence, peers take on increasing importance, while social skills are still developing. However, how emotions of peers influence social decisions during that age period is insufficiently known. We therefore examined the effects of three different emotional responses (anger, disappointment, happiness) on decisions about fairness in a sample of 156 adolescents aged 12-17 years. Participants received written emotional responses from peers in a version of the Dictator Game to a previous unfair offer. Adolescents reacted with more generous offers after disappointed reactions compared to angry and happy reactions. Furthermore, we found preliminary evidence for developmental differences over adolescence, since older adolescents differentiated more between the three emotions than younger adolescents. In addition, individual differences in social value orientation played a role in decisions after happy reactions of peers to a previous unfair offer, such that participants with a "proself" orientation made more unfair offers to happy peers than "prosocial" participants. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that adolescents take emotions of peers into account when making social decisions, while individual differences in social value orientation affect these decisions, and age seems to influence the nature of the reaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824368PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00745DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reactions peers
8
peers influence
8
decisions fairness
8
emotions peers
8
social decisions
8
decisions age
8
emotional responses
8
previous unfair
8
unfair offer
8
happy reactions
8

Similar Publications

Older adults with cognitive impairment are at risk of medication-taking errors. This study assessed the impact of providing medication adherence feedback to cognitively impaired older adults. Forty participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia had their medication adherence electronically monitored for 8 weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Children with a developmental language disorder (DLD) frequently experience deficits in cognitive skills such as working memory (WM) and sustained attention (SA), which are closely related to language development. Yet, these cognitive deficits remain underexplored in early childhood, particularly during the preschool years.

Objective: This study explores WM and SA in Chilean preschoolers with a DLD compared to their typically developing (TD) peers, using the nonverbal tasks "Torpo the Clumsy Mole" for WM and the Continuous Performance Task (CPT) "Duno and the Worms" for SA, both from the Child Neuropsychological Evaluation Test (TENI in Spanish).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Adolescents' perceptions, experiences, and reactions to "fake" vaping devices.

Drug Alcohol Depend

December 2024

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, 95 Kirkham Street Box 1361, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.

Article Synopsis
  • Vaping among adolescents, particularly with fake devices, poses significant health risks, as highlighted by the 2019-2020 EVALI outbreak.
  • Interviews with 47 California teens revealed their awareness of fake vaping products, which they viewed as low-quality and dangerous, learned about through peers and social media.
  • Participants felt that the existence of these fake devices was driven by profit, calling for better public messaging and stronger regulations to protect young users.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

School-based social and educational support for siblings of children with cancer - Siblings' and parents' feedback on an intervention proposal (SUPREME).

Eur J Oncol Nurs

December 2024

Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address:

Purpose: Siblings of children with cancer experience the consequences of their brother or sister's disease and treatment firsthand, often causing social and school-related difficulties. This study aimed to gather parents' and siblings' feedback on a proposal for a school-based social and educational support intervention for siblings with the goal of tailoring the program to meet the needs of siblings.

Method: Adopting a criterion sampling strategy, we conducted interviews with 20 parents and 11 siblings, aged 7-19 years, of children with cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!