AI Article Synopsis

  • The study used DGGE and barcoded 16S rRNA pyrosequencing to analyze bacterial communities in a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) for turbot and sole fish species.
  • Significant differences in bacterial composition were found between the two fish species, indicating species-specific effects on water microbial communities, with Proteobacteria being the most abundant.
  • Several potential pathogens were identified, but no symptomatic fish were observed, highlighting the need for careful interpretation of pathogen detection in aquaculture monitoring.

Article Abstract

The present study combined a DGGE and barcoded 16S rRNA pyrosequencing approach to assess bacterial composition in the water of a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) with a shallow raceway system (SRS) for turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and sole (Solea senegalensis). Barcoded pyrosequencing results were also used to determine the potential pathogen load in the RAS studied. Samples were collected from the water supply pipeline (Sup), fish production tanks (Pro), sedimentation filter (Sed), biofilter tank (Bio), and protein skimmer (Ozo; also used as an ozone reaction chamber) of twin RAS operating in parallel (one for each fish species). Our results revealed pronounced differences in bacterial community composition between turbot and sole RAS, suggesting that in the systems studied there is a strong species-specific effect on water bacterial communities. Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum in the water supply and all RAS compartments. Other important taxonomic groups included the phylum Bacteriodetes. The saltwater supplied displayed a markedly lower richness and appeared to have very little influence on bacterial composition. The following potentially pathogenic species were detected: Photobacterium damselae in turbot (all compartments), Tenacibaculum discolor in turbot and sole (all compartments), Tenacibaculum soleae in turbot (all compartments) and sole (Pro, Sed and Bio), and Serratia marcescens in turbot (Sup, Sed, Bio and Ozo) and sole (only Sed) RAS. Despite the presence of these pathogens, no symptomatic fish were observed. Although we were able to identify potential pathogens, this approach should be employed with caution when monitoring aquaculture systems, as the required phylogenetic resolution for reliable identification of pathogens may not always be possible to achieve when employing 16S rRNA gene fragments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836758PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080847PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bacterial communities
8
potential pathogens
8
recirculating aquaculture
8
aquaculture system
8
scophthalmus maximus
8
solea senegalensis
8
16s rrna
8
bacterial composition
8
water supply
8
turbot sole
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!