In this study we investigated the differences in the properties of pellicles formed from stimulated parotid saliva (PS), which contains little or no mucin; and stimulated whole mouth saliva (WMS), which contains mainly two types of mucin: MUC5B and MUC7. By contacting WMS and PS with quartz-crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) and dual polarisation interferometer (DPI) hydroxyapatite (the main component of enamel) coated sensors, we observed the formation and structure of the respective salivary pellicles. As this was the first time that DPI hydroxyapatite sensors have been used to measure salivary pellicle adsorption; the techniques combined allowed us to measure the hydrated mass, dry mass, thickness and viscoelastic properties of the pellicle; but also to record the density of the PS and WMS formed pellicles. Subsequently, the PS pellicle was shown to form a denser layer than WMS pellicle; which would suggest that the proteins present in PS are also responsible for forming the dense basal layer of the acquired enamel pellicle. Whereas proteins present in the WMS are more likely to help form the softer outer layer of the pellicle. The data presented help to further define the mechanisms leading to the multi-layered structure of the salivary pellicle and demonstrate that salivary composition has an important effect on the structural properties of the adsorbed pellicle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.10.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

salivary pellicles
8
hydroxyapatite sensors
8
dpi hydroxyapatite
8
pellicle
8
salivary pellicle
8
pellicle proteins
8
salivary
5
wms
5
structural characterisation
4
characterisation parotid
4

Similar Publications

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of salivary pellicle modification with polyphenol-rich solutions containing fluoride on enamel erosion and abrasion. Human enamel specimens (n = 14/group) were assigned to five pellicle-modifying groups: GSE+F (grape seed extract +500 ppm F-); CRA+F (cranberry extract +500 ppm F-); NaF (sodium fluoride solution -5 00ppm F-); Sn+F (commercial solution, SnCl2/NaF/AmF); and DW (deionized water, negative control). The specimens were submitted to 5 cycles, each one consisting of pellicle formation (120μl, 30 min, 37°C, no agitation), followed by pellicle modification with the experimental solutions (5 ml, 2 min, 25ºC, 70 rpm), and subsequent salivary pellicle formation (120 μl, 60 min, 37°C, no agitation).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dental caries is primarily caused by cariogenic bacteria metabolizing carbohydrates to produce acidic substances that erode the dental hard tissues. Traditional remineralization treatments often have limited efficacy due to their lack of antibacterial activity. According to the Interrupting Dental Caries (IDC) theory, ideal caries-preventive materials should possess both antibacterial and remineralizing properties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction Complex interactions between cariogenic bacteria and host factors modulate dental caries. , a gram-positive facultative anaerobe plays a prominent role in the initiation of caries. The ability of to adhere to salivary enamel pellicle results in an acidic local habitat for the organism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the context of the oral cavity, an organic layer known as the mucosal pellicle (MP) adheres to the surface of the oral epithelium, playing a pivotal role in lubricating and safeguarding oral tissues. The formation of the MP is driven by interactions between a transmembrane mucin known as MUC1, located on the oral epithelium, and salivary secreted mucin, namely MUC5B and MUC7. This study aimed to investigate the function of MUC1 and the influence of its structure on MP lubrication properties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This proof-of-concept sequence of in vivo/in vitro studies aimed to unveil the role of acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) engineering with statherin-derived peptide (StN15) on the AEP protein profile, enamel biofilm microbiome in vivo and on enamel demineralization in vitro.

Design: In vivo studies, 10 volunteers, in 2 independent experiments (2 days each), rinsed (10 mL,1 min) with: deionized water (negative control) or 1.88 × 10 M StN15.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!