Objective: To explore an ideal method of digestive tract reconstruction and tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy after radical proximal gastrectomy.

Methods: Thirty patients in the reconstruction group were treated by jejunal interposition, and other 30 patients received gastroesophagostomy (control group). The operation time, operation risk, occurrence of reflux esophagitis and postoperative 1-, 3-, 6-month nutrition statuses were evaluated. Forty-three patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX-6 and tolerance to the chemotherapy was assessed.

Results: The operation time of the reconstructional group was (162.2 ± 14.0)min and that of the control group was (137.6 ± 18.9)mi, with a statistically significant difference. (t = -5.7, P<0.01). There were no significant differences of operation risk, postoperative 2-, 4-, and 6-day C-reactive protein, 2-, 4- and 6-day systemic inflammatory response syndrome between the two groups. The differences of the occurrence of postoperative 1-, 3- and 6-month reflux esophagitis and 3- and 6-month nutritional status between the two groups were statistically significant. 18 of 19 (94.7%) patients in the reconstruction group completed all six cycles of chemotherapy, 24 patients in the control group received chemotherapy, and 12 (50.0%) of them completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy. There was a significant difference in the completion rate of chemotherapy of the two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusions: The postoperative complications of jejunal interposition are not inceased, the symptoms of reflux esophagitis are alleviated, the quality of life can be improved, and there is a better tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, jejunal interposition after radical proximal gastrectomy is a rational method of digestive tract reconstruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jejunal interposition
8
radical proximal
8
adjuvant chemotherapy
8
patients received
8
control group
8
operation time
8
[application jejunal
4
interposition radical
4
proximal gastrectomy]
4
gastrectomy] objective
4

Similar Publications

Systematic review of free jejunal flap for secondary esophageal reconstruction.

Ann Chir Plast Esthet

January 2025

Service de chirurgie plastique et reconstructrice, HELORA Jolimont, rue Ferrer 159, 7100 La Louvière, Belgium.

Introduction: Esophagus reconstruction could be complicated by leakage, stenosis or graft loss. Salvage surgery may be needed in case of failure of endoscopic treatment or large esophagus defect. Although free jejunal flap is admitted for salvage head and neck reconstruction, few reports assess the results of free jejunal interposition in salvage esophagus reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is commonly used to remove proximal gastric cancer leading to gastroesophageal reflux and requires digestive tract reconstruction. This study is to compare the performance of esophagogastrostomy (EG), jejunal interposition (JI), and double tract reconstruction (DTR) on post-PG reconstruction effectiveness.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the clinical data of 94 PG patients who underwent digestive tract reconstruction by EG (37 patients), JI (29 patients) or DTR (28 patients).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are characterised by the appearance of colorectal cancer if the disease is left to follow its natural course, which means they frequently undergo prophylactic colectomy at a young age. In these patients, duodenal cancer becomes the leading cause of death, which deems surveillance necessary. Gastric cancer, although rare, can also occur in these patients, and total gastrectomy is the usual treatment option.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of functional jejunal interposition (FJI) and simple jejunal interposition (SJI) as reconstruction methods following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The study assessed primary endpoints such as nutritional status and quality of life, as well as secondary endpoints including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative and postoperative complications, and survival rate.

Methods: A total of 113 patients were randomly assigned to either the FJI group or the SJI group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 3-Arm case-matched analysis of anti-reflux reconstruction methods after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy - Single tract jejunal interposition vs double tract reconstruction vs tube-like stomach reconstruction.

Eur J Surg Oncol

November 2024

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, China; Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China; General Surgery Institute of Yangzhou, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China. Electronic address:

Background: Owing to reportedly superior prognosis, proximal gastrectomy (PG) is expected to be an alternative to total gastrectomy for upper gastric cancer. However, limited data are available regarding the optimal anti-reflux reconstruction method after PG. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic PG with single-tract jejunal interposition (LPG-STJI), double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR), and tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) on surgical outcomes in patients with upper-third gastric cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!