A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

X-ray field size and patient dosimetry. | LitMetric

Purpose: Limiting the size of the x-ray field during radiography is an important radiation safety practice and the sole responsibility of the radiologic technologist. Collimation reduces the volume of tissue irradiated and therefore reduces patient exposure and improves image quality. The purpose of the research experiment was to investigate the effect of decreasing the x-ray field size on patient dosimetry during lumbar spine imaging.

Methods: The x-ray field size was decreased from 14 × 17 in (35 × 43 cm) to 8 × 17 in (20 × 43 cm) with an increase in mAs to maintain exposure to the image receptor. Patient dosimetry was investigated by measuring the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) exposure to the abdominal region of an anthropomorphic adult male phantom. Seven TLD chips were placed in the abdominal region, exposed, and replaced for each of 10 exposures, totaling 70 exposed TLDs. A 2-way factorial analysis of variance for independent samples was calculated to determine whether x-ray field size and the TLD locations altered the milliroentgen (mR) reading.

Results: The TLDs located closest to the lumbar spine yielded no significant change in patient dose for the 8 × 17 in (20 × 43 cm) x-ray field size following the increase in mAs. However, the TLDs located closest to the lateral edge of the 8 × 17 in (20 × 43 cm) collimated x-ray beam received a significantly (P < .001) lower mR exposure (> 60%).

Conclusion: Radiologic technologists should make considerable effort to limit the x-ray field size to the region of interest to reduce patient exposure.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

x-ray field
28
field size
24
patient dosimetry
12
x-ray
8
size patient
8
patient exposure
8
lumbar spine
8
increase mas
8
abdominal region
8
tlds located
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!