A quality improvement initiative for improving appropriateness of referrals from a cancer center to subacute rehabilitation.

J Pain Symptom Manage

The Harry J. Duffey Family Pain and Palliative Care Program, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Published: July 2014

Background: Subacute rehabilitation may not be appropriate for many patients with advanced cancer. We evaluated outcomes of cancer center inpatients transferred to subacute rehabilitation, implemented a multidisciplinary intervention to improve appropriateness of referrals, and evaluated its potential impact.

Measures: Percentage of patients who returned for further anticancer treatment after subacute rehabilitation (preintervention) and percentage of patients who were referred and transferred to subacute rehabilitation (pre and post).

Intervention: Stakeholder engagement; feedback about outcomes to faculty and staff; increased communication between therapy, social work, nursing, and physicians about therapy referrals; and goals of care at daily prerounds meeting.

Outcomes: Potential reduction in subacute rehabilitation referrals and transfers. Intensive intervention was difficult to maintain, but team is continuing efforts at improved communication.

Conclusions/lessons Learned: Intervention may have improved outcomes short-term but was complicated and difficult to maintain. Addressing appropriateness of subacute rehabilitation referrals can occur within a multidisciplinary approach to improving communication about goals of care for patients with advanced disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subacute rehabilitation
28
appropriateness referrals
8
cancer center
8
patients advanced
8
transferred subacute
8
percentage patients
8
goals care
8
rehabilitation referrals
8
difficult maintain
8
subacute
7

Similar Publications

Objective: To investigate the safety, feasibility and acceptability of the Neurofenix platform for upper-limb rehabilitation in acute and subacute stroke.

Design: A feasibility randomised controlled trial with a parallel process evaluation.

Setting: Acute Stroke Unit and participants' homes (London, UK).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Regulatory T Cells for Stroke Recovery: A Promising Immune Therapeutic Strategy.

CNS Neurosci Ther

January 2025

Department of Research, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability among adults. Given the restricted therapeutic window for intravascular interventions and neuroprotection during the acute phase, there has been a growing focus on tissue repair and functional recovery in the subacute and chronic phases after stroke. The pro-inflammatory microglial polarization occurs in subacute and chronic phases after stroke and may represent therapeutic targets for stroke recovery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In modern war theaters, exposures to blast overpressures are one of the most common causes of brain injury. These pervasive events result in acute and chronic cerebrovascular degenerative processes. Using a rat model of blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury, we identified intramural periarterial hematomas as early primary acute lesions induced by blast exposures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of graded activity compared to placebo, sham, or no treatment, on pain and function in adults with acute and subacute non-specific low back pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of 2-week neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on quadriceps muscle atrophy and lower extremity motor score in individuals with subacute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: This stratified randomized controlled trial, conducted in the advanced critical care center of a university hospital, comprised 49 individuals with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade C and D incomplete cervical SCI. The participants were stratified based on the ASIA impairment scale grade and randomly assigned to the control (n = 25) or NMES (n = 24) group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!