Involving the public in systematic reviews: a narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples.

J Comp Eff Res

NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire & the Humber, School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Published: September 2012

This paper reviews the recent literature on public involvement in the systematic review process. We examine how relevant organizations involve the public in their review processes and how the public are involved in individual reviews. We identified nine surveys or reports of public involvement in systematic reviews at an organizational level and eight examples of public involvement in individual reviews. The public was found to be involved in the following stages of the review process: topic prioritization; refining the scope of the review; suggesting, locating and appraising the literature; interpreting findings; and writing up the review. Numerous tensions, facilitating strategies and recommendations for good practice were identified. Future research directions are delineated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer.12.46DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public involvement
12
systematic reviews
8
involvement systematic
8
review process
8
public involved
8
individual reviews
8
review
6
public
6
reviews
5
involving public
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!