Background Context: As the biomechanical foundation of the spine, the pelvis was found to display rotation in the transverse plane in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the possible factors influencing the pelvic axial rotation (PAR) and its mechanism in patients with AIS remain unclear.

Purpose: To characterize the PAR in AIS patients with right major thoracic (MT) or major left thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve and to explore the associated influencing factors and probable mechanism of compensation by analyzing the association between PAR and other spinal radiographic parameters.

Study Design: Retrospective study.

Patient Sample: All patients with the primary diagnosis of AIS from January 2008 to November 2009 were retrieved from our scoliosis database.

Outcome Measures: Age, Cobb angle, and apex rotation of the main curve and the compensatory curve, curve flexibility, and PAR.

Methods: One-hundred thirty-two patients with right MT (14.7±1.8 years, 48±6.9°) and 83 patients with left major TL/L (14.7±1.5 years, 46±6.6°) were retrospectively reviewed. On standing full-spine posteroanterior radiographs, the PAR was quantified by the left/right hemi-pelvis width ratio (L/R ratio); then the subjects in both MT and major TL/L groups were divided into two subgroups: L/R ratio ≤1 (pelvis rotated to the right, R-PAR group); and L/R ratio >1 (pelvis rotated to the left, L-PAR group). Comparisons of all variables were performed between the L- and R-PAR subgroups; correlation and regression analysis were carried out to identify the influencing factors of PAR.

Results: The majority of the MT and major TL/L patients (75.8% vs. 60.2%) displayed right pelvic rotation, which was in the same direction as the thoracic curve. The incidence of R-PAR was greater in the MT patients than the major TL/L ones (p=.016). Lumbar flexibility in MT patients with R-PAR was greater than in MT patients with L-PAR (0.96±0.27 vs. 0.81±0.33, p=.038), which was contrary to the findings in the major TL/L patients (L-PAR>R-PAR, 0.79±0.15 vs. 0.70±0.22, p=.024). In the MT patients with R-PAR, the L/R ratio showed significant positive correlations with the lumbar Cobb angle (r=0.424) as well as with the apex rotation (r=0.488), which was further identified as an influencing factor (R=0.418) of the PAR. Significant positive correlations between L/R ratio and thoracic apex rotation (r=0.361) also were detected.

Conclusion: The majority of AIS patients with right MT or left major TL/L curves were found to have PAR to the right, in the same direction as the thoracic curve. The lumbar flexibility and apex rotation significantly influenced the PAR direction and magnitude. Moreover, the pelvis might be involved in compensation for the MT deformity through its connection with the lumbar spine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

major tl/l
24
l/r ratio
20
apex rotation
16
thoracic curve
12
patients
12
major
10
pelvic axial
8
rotation
8
axial rotation
8
adolescent idiopathic
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study evaluated the relationship between maximal axial vertebra rotation (maxAVR) and other clinical and radiological indexes, compared to apical vertebra rotation (AVR) in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: Forty consecutive patients of AIS with Cobb angle of major curve > 40° were included. They were scanned by an EOS imaging system and had trunk rotational angle (TRA) measured by scoliometer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effectiveness of lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) compared to thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with main thoracolumbar or lumbar curves.
  • A controlled cohort of 82 patients revealed that while LSO is equally effective as TLSO for main TL/L curves, it is less effective for associated minor thoracic curves.
  • The research also identified the initial size of minor thoracic curves as a potential risk factor influencing treatment outcomes, with a cut-off value of 21° established for better prediction of results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requires a careful choice of fusion levels. The usual recommendation for the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) for double major or thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves falls on L3 or L4. The aim of the present study is to assess if the spinal fusion with LIV selection of L3 or L4 in AIS patients has a clinical or radiological impact in terms of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in distal unfused segments at long-term follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Waist line asymmetry is a major cosmetic concern in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The primary surgical goal in patients with AIS is to correct spinal deformities and prevent further progression while maintaining global alignment. Additionally, an important objective of surgical treatment is to address physical appearance by reducing asymmetry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter registry.

Objective: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in an operative cohort of patients (OP) and compare them with a matched nonoperative cohort (NON).

Summary Of Background Data: Historically, the surgical outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been radiographically evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!