Principal component analysis is a powerful tool in biomechanics for reducing complex multivariate datasets to a subset of important parameters. However, interpreting the biomechanical meaning of these parameters can be a subjective process. Biomechanical interpretations that are based on visual inspection of extreme 5th and 95th percentile waveforms may be confounded when extreme waveforms express more than one biomechanical feature. This study compares interpretation of principal components using representative extremes with a recently developed method, called single component reconstruction, which provides an uncontaminated visualization of each individual biomechanical feature. Example datasets from knee joint moments, lateral gastrocnemius EMG, and lumbar spine kinematics are used to demonstrate that the representative extremes method and single component reconstruction can yield equivalent interpretations of principal components. However, single component reconstruction interpretation cannot be contaminated by other components, which may enhance the use and understanding of principal component analysis within the biomechanics community.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.09.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!