Previous studies have shown that performance on Williams and Pearlberg's (2006) complex associative learning task is a good predictor of fluid intelligence. This task is similar in structure to that used in studying the fan effect (Anderson, 1974), as both tasks involve forming multiple associations and require retrieval in the face of interference. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relations among complex associative learning, working memory, and fluid intelligence. Specifically, we asked whether retrieval efficiency, as measured by the fan effect, could account for the relation between complex associative learning and performance on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Consistent with previous findings, complex associative learning predicted Raven's performance, but the fan effect did not account for this relation. Notably, the learning phase of the fan effect task was significantly correlated with both complex associative learning and Raven's performance, providing further support for the importance of learning as a predictor of fluid intelligence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3811950PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.791299DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

associative learning
24
complex associative
20
fluid intelligence
12
performance raven's
8
learning
8
retrieval efficiency
8
predictor fluid
8
fan account
8
account relation
8
raven's performance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!