Background: The presence of barriers is not sufficient to explain breastfeeding rate disparities. A relatively unexplored area in coping with breastfeeding barriers is culture.
Objective: This research aims to better understand the role of culture in a woman's infant feeding decision by using race and socioeconomic status as indicators of culture.
Methods: Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with 42 pregnant women or mothers of infants younger than 12 months. Focus group composition was determined by self-identified African American or white race and self-reported eligibility for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) or ineligibility (non-WIC).
Results: Most participants acknowledged that breastfeeding was best, yet differences arose between groups in the perception of, and reaction to, breastfeeding barriers. WIC and non-WIC participants of both races indicated that some circumstances necessitated formula use. WIC participants felt that this was personally and socially acceptable due to need, whereas non-WIC participants felt that this was personally and socially unacceptable. When a barrier arose, WIC participants of both races felt that the infant feeding choice was not theirs and formula use might be inevitable. In contrast, non-WIC participants of both races expressed that they persevered to continue breastfeeding and did so by establishing small, achievable goals and seeking mentors.
Conclusion: Educational and public health efforts to reduce breastfeeding disparities may be enhanced if support is tailored to acknowledge cultural differences among women and address factors that make either breastfeeding or formula feeding acceptable, or even preferable, within their communities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0890334413508338 | DOI Listing |
Appetite
November 2024
Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Am J Prev Med
December 2024
Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Breastfeed Med
October 2023
Department of Rehabilitation, Exercise, and Nutrition Science, College of Allied Health Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
May 2023
College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A & M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA.
Being cognizant of the pronounced health advantages of breastfeeding for both the nursing mother and her infant, the breastfeeding dyad, we examined breastfeeding rates among Floridian women who gave birth from 2012 to 2014 ( = 639,052). We investigated the associations between breastfeeding initiation and WIC-based breastfeeding support (the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children), education level, and race and ethnicity. We compared the percentage of breastfeeding mothers between those in the WIC program and those who were not, and we compared breastfeeding rates across racial and ethnic groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBirth
March 2023
UNC Charlotte Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Background: Nearly 40% of pregnant women in 2016 were enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Prior studies have investigated nutritional behaviors among WIC participants and access to WIC breastfeeding counseling services. However, there are no (few?) nationally representative, large-scale analyses of WIC users and pregnancy behaviors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!