Microwave diathermy for treating nonspecific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Spine J

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital "San Agustín", Avenida de San Cristóbal, s/n, Linares, 23700 Jaén, Spain; University of Jaén, Campus de las Lagunillas, s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain.

Published: August 2014

Background Context: Although the use of deep heat therapy is widespread, there is scant literature available on its effectiveness in treating back or neck pain.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of microwave diathermy to treat nonspecific chronic neck pain.

Design: The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Patient Sample: The patient sample consisted of 149 patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain in a hospital of the Andalusian Public Health Care System, Spain

Outcome Measures: The study outcome measures are as follows: at baseline, pain intensity (using a visual analogue scale), disability (Neck Disability Index), and health-related quality of life (36-item short form health survey [SF-36]); at 3 weeks, baseline measures and patients' perceived overall outcome and satisfaction with the treatment; and at 6 months, 3-week measures, therapeutic co-interventions, and adherence to exercises.

Methods: Patients were allocated randomly to three groups. The first group received continuous microwave diathermy, the second group was administered pulsed microwaves, and the third group (the control group) received unplugged microwaves. All three groups received the same general treatment: range of motion, isometric exercises, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Results: The three groups had reduced pain and disability, and improvement was seen in some dimensions of the SF-36. However, there were no differences found in any of the parameters measured among the three therapeutic groups.

Conclusions: Microwave diathermy does not provide additional benefit to a treatment regimen of chronic neck pain that already involves other treatment approaches.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microwave diathermy
16
chronic neck
16
nonspecific chronic
12
neck pain
12
three groups
12
randomized controlled
8
group received
8
neck
6
pain
5
microwave
4

Similar Publications

The value of TECAR in acute painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a pilot study.

Clin Ter

October 2024

Director UOC Neuro Rehabilitation IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.

Low-back pain is frequent, especially in the active adult population after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Several orthopaedic conditions can cause low back pain, significantly worsening the quality of life. The treatments vary from drugs, physical therapy, kinesiology, and local infiltration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Osteoarthritis (OA) impacts 528 million people worldwide, mainly affecting knee and hip joints, particularly in women over 55, and creates significant economic challenges, while the effectiveness of physiotherapy methods for pain management remains uncertain.
  • A systematic review of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials investigated various therapeutic modalities (like ultrasound and electrical stimulation) and revealed that 15 out of 30 protocols achieved meaningful pain reduction, yet no distinct advantages among the different methods were found.
  • The study recommends a comprehensive treatment approach, starting with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and continuing with ultrasound and deep microwave diathermy, while also suggesting a careful evaluation of spinal cord nerve stimulation for hip OA patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surgical and Percutaneous Image-Guided Therapies of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

September 2024

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Drs. Bodard and Cornelis), New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College (Dr. Cornelis), New York, New York.

Article Synopsis
  • This review examines various surgical and nonsurgical treatments for abdominal wall endometriosis to clarify optimal care options due to existing clinical uncertainty.* -
  • A total of 51 articles were analyzed, involving 2674 patients, showing that surgical methods had the best local tumor control and pain relief, with a median local tumor control rate of 100%.* -
  • Minor adverse events occurred in 17.5% of surgical cases and up to 76.4% with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), while severe adverse events were noted in 25 surgical patients.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To inform radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure guidelines the World Health Organization (WHO) is bringing together evidence on RF-EMF in relation to health outcomes prioritised for evaluation by experts in this field. Given this, a network of topic experts and methodologists have conducted a series of systematic reviews collecting, assessing, and synthesising data of relevance to these guidelines. Here we present a systematic review of the effect of RF-EMF exposure on adverse pregnancy outcomes in human observational studies which follows the WHO handbook for guideline development and the COSTER conduct guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Alternative treatments of adenomyosis - an update in procedural management and clinical outcomes.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol

August 2024

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Purpose Of Review: Adenomyosis is a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain. Definitive diagnosis and treatment have historically been by uterine histopathology at time of hysterectomy; however, advances in imaging have supported earlier diagnosis and subsequent conservative treatment. This review aims to update the evidence supporting the uterine-sparing, procedural management options with a focus on clinical outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!