Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe bicycle helmet use among Montreal cyclists as a step towards injury prevention programming.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, cyclists were observed during 60-minute periods at 22 locations on the island of Montreal. There were 1-3 observation periods per location. Observations took place between August 16 and October 31, 2011. Standard statistical methods were used, unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were calculated.

Results: A total of 4,789 cyclists were observed. The helmet-wearing proportion of all cyclists observed was 46% (95% CI 44-47). Women had a higher helmet-wearing proportion than men (50%, 95% CI 47-52 vs. 44%, 95% CI 42-45, respectively). Youth had the highest helmet-wearing proportion (73%, 95% CI 64-81), while young adults had the lowest (34%, 95% CI 30-37). Visible minorities were observed wearing a helmet 29% (95% CI 25-34) of the time compared to Caucasians, 47% (95% CI 46-49). BIXI (bike sharing program) riders were observed wearing a helmet 12% (95% CI 10-15) of the time compared to riders with their own bike, 51% (95% CI 49-52).

Conclusions: Although above the national average, bicycle helmet use in Montreal is still considerably low given that the majority of cyclists do not wear a helmet. Injury Prevention Programs could target the entire cyclist population, but special attention may be warranted in specific groups such as young men, visible minorities, BIXI riders, and those riding in tourist areas. Additionally, a collaborative enterprise with the bicycle sharing system BIXI Montreal™ could prove to be fruitful in addressing the availability of bike helmets for BIXI riders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973688PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/cjph.104.3936DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bicycle helmet
12
helmet montreal
12
cyclists observed
12
helmet-wearing proportion
12
injury prevention
8
95%
8
visible minorities
8
observed wearing
8
wearing helmet
8
time compared
8

Similar Publications

Using the methodology developed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for motorcyclists, this paper estimates bicycle helmet effectiveness factors (HEFs), defined as the percentage greater chance that a helmeted bicyclist will avoid a fatality or serious injury relative to a non-wearer. We analyse reported motor vehicle-bicycle collisions in Colorado between 2006 and 2014. We conclude that NHTSA's motorcycle HEF methodology did not provide reasonable results given underreporting of low-severity collisions of helmeted bicyclists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How does distraction affect cyclists' severe crashes? A hybrid CatBoost-SHAP and random parameters binary logit approach.

Accid Anal Prev

December 2024

School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran. Electronic address:

Cyclists are among the most vulnerable road users, increasingly subject to various sources of distraction, including the use of mobile phones and engagement in other tasks while navigating urban environments. Understanding and mitigating the impact of these distractions on cyclist safety is crucial. Despite the importance of this issue, the effect of distraction on injury severity in cycling crashes has not been extensively studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in cyclists is a growing public health problem, with helmets being the major protection gear. Finite element head models have been increasingly used to engineer safer helmets often by mitigating brain strain peaks. However, how different helmets alter the spatial distribution of brain strain remains largely unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In 2022; South Korea had 3.3 million daily bicycle users and around 13,000 crashes with 190 fatalities annually. While helmets are known to prevent head injuries, research on their effectiveness in preventing fatalities is lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This research examines a five-year analysis of bicycle-related injuries to see how helmet and protective gear use impacts injury severity and recovery.
  • Using data from the National Trauma Data Standard, the study focused on over 135,000 bicycle incident cases, comparing helmet users to non-users in terms of Glasgow Coma Scale scores and hospital stays.
  • The results showed that helmet users had significantly better GCS scores and shorter hospital stays, with notable differences in helmet use trends across age groups, highlighting the need for increased helmet usage, especially among younger riders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!