A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Tiotropium versus placebo for inadequately controlled asthma: a meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Objective: This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of tiotropium to standard treatment regimens for inadequately controlled asthma.

Methods: A systematic search was made of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and a hand search of leading respiratory journals. Randomized, double-blind clinical trials on the treatment of inadequately controlled asthma for ≥ 4 weeks with the addition of tiotropium, compared with placebo, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMDs), with 95% CI.

Results: Six trials met the inclusion criteria. The addition of tiotropium, compared with placebo, significantly improved all spirometric indices, including morning and evening peak expiratory flow (WMD 20.59 L/min, 95% CI 15.36-25.81 L/min, P < .001; and WMD 24.95 L/min, 95% CI 19.22-30.69 L/min, P < .001, respectively), trough and peak FEV1 (WMD 0.13 L, 95% CI 0.09-0.18 L, P < .001; and WMD 0.10 L, 95% CI 0.06-0.14 L, P < .001, respectively), the area under the curve of the first 3 h of FEV1 (WMD 0.13 L, 95% CI 0.08-0.18 L, P < .001), trough and peak FVC (WMD 0.1 L, 95% CI 0.05-0.15 L, P < .001; and WMD 0.08 L, 95% CI 0.04-0.13 L, P < .001, respectively), the area under the curve of the first 3 h of FVC (WMD 0.11 L, 95% CI 0.06-0.15 L, P < .001). The mean change in the 7-point Asthma Control Questionnaire score (WMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.03, P = .01) was markedly lower in tiotropium group, but not clinically important. There were no significant differences in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (WMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.20, P = .09), night awakenings (WMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.05, P = .99) or rescue medication use (WMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.00, P = .06). No significant increase was noticed in adverse events in the tiotropium group (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.03, P = .08).

Conclusions: The addition of tiotropium to standard treatment regimens has significantly improved lung function without increasing adverse events in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Long-term trials are required to assess the effects of the addition of tiotropium on asthma exacerbations and mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02703DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

addition tiotropium
20
inadequately controlled
16
95%
14
controlled asthma
12
wmd
12
001 wmd
12
tiotropium
8
tiotropium standard
8
standard treatment
8
treatment regimens
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!