A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between CellprepPlus® and ThinPrep® liquid-based preparations in effusion cytology. | LitMetric

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is being increasingly used for body fluid specimens and has improved diagnostic accuracy when compared to conventional smears. We compared the diagnostic accuracy and cellular morphologic features between CellprepPlus® LBC and ThinPrep® LBC in effusion cytology. One hundred and eighty body fluid specimens, consisting of 119 pleural fluid specimens, 59 peritoneal fluid specimens, and 2 pericardial fluid specimens, were obtained from 166 patients. Equal volumes of body fluid from each specimen were used in the CellprepPlus® and ThinPrep® preparations. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. In addition, we selected 16 specimens from patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma, confirmed them by both LBC preparations, and measured the size of the nucleus in the tumor cells in these specimens. The sensitivity of the CellprepPlus® and ThinPrep® methods was 73.1% and 50.0%, respectively. The specificity and positive predictive values were 100% for both LBC methods, and the negative predictive values of the CellprepPlus® and ThinPrep® methods were 90.9% and 83.3%, respectively. The average nuclear size of the tumor cells was calculated as 20.87 μm using the CellprepPlus® method and 15.08 μm using the ThinPrep® method (P < 0.05). The CellprepPlus® method provided better diagnostic accuracy of effusion cytology compared to the ThinPrep® method and revealed the characteristic morphological features of tumor cells, including large and hypochromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, distinct nuclear membranes, and high cellularity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dc.23041DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluid specimens
20
cellprepplus® thinprep®
16
diagnostic accuracy
12
body fluid
12
predictive values
12
effusion cytology
8
specificity positive
8
negative predictive
8
tumor cells
8
thinprep® methods
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!