AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared different methods of administering lidocaine and using a tourniquet to minimize injection pain associated with a new formulation of propofol.
  • Groups of patients received varying combinations of lidocaine and tourniquet positions before receiving propofol.
  • Results indicated that the best method for reducing injection pain involved using lidocaine with a tourniquet and the patient's arm down, leading to significantly lower pain scores compared to the control group.

Article Abstract

Background: Although the new formulation of lipid-free microemulsion propofol (MP) has some advantages over the lipid emulsion, it reportedly produces more injection pain than lipid-based propofol. Intravenous lidocaine with application of a rubber tourniquet before administration of propofol is considered to be the best method for reducing injection pain; however, this technique is not perfect.

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of different methods of tourniquet application and lidocaine administration on MP injection pain.

Methods: This single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 140 patients aged 18 to 65 years. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 35 each). Group A received MP (2 mg/kg) after lidocaine (0.6 mg/kg) with a tourniquet with arm down (venous engorgement); group B received MP after lidocaine with a tourniquet with arm up (venous gravity drainage); group C received MP with a tourniquet with arm down; and group D (control group) received MP only (with no tourniquet). In groups A and C, the tourniquet was released after MP; in group B, the tourniquet was released before MP. Injection pain was evaluated by using a verbal pain score (VPS). The bispectral index, the time from the beginning of drug injection to the loss of eyelash reflex, and time to the lowest bispectral index value were recorded.

Results: Group A showed significantly less incidence of pain than the control group when MP was injected. The mean VPS was significantly lower in groups A, B, and C than in group D (the control group). The VPS of group A was significantly lower than that in group B. Other observed values were not significantly different.

Conclusions: We concluded that intravenous retention of lidocaine with the application of a rubber tourniquet under venous engorgement of the arm reduces the incidence and intensity of MP injection pain.

Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000010725.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.09.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group received
16
injection pain
12
group
12
tourniquet arm
12
control group
12
tourniquet
10
microemulsion propofol
8
methods tourniquet
8
lidocaine application
8
application rubber
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!